From: Steve C. <g3c...@cd...> - 2004-08-20 16:48:22
|
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Tony Graham wrote: > There used to be. It's the patching that turned out to be dumb. All right, but right now I am having difficulties building the gnome-print backend, linking errors with many library functions. May be I need a new version of the libraries. But: The "Source" URI of gnome-print on the building xmlroff page is misleading; it points to the directory for version 2.2 even though version 2.3 (or later) is claimed to be required. Tony, I also think it will be helpful if you also post the exact versions of the packages you use, because if I try the newest version of gnome-print (2.7.1) it says it needs Pango 1.5, which even if I had it installed, I would have serious doubts about it working with PangoPDF / xmlroff. > The PDFlib backend would never go in because of PDFlib's license. I > didn't realise that when I started. > > Pango and GNOME Print work together better than they ever used to, > possibly in part due to my enhancement request [1], which is why I'm > hopeful about the current Pango obviating much of PangoPDF. > > The extra PangoAttributes could be submitted to Pango if they're > cooked enough. I quite like the callback attribute, myself, but it's > only had one limited use, and that is in the wrong backend. Thanks for the information; I will take a closer look some time. -- Steve Cheng 鄭君博 docbook2X: <URL:http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/> |