Re: [xmlroff] Re: xmlroff on Windows

[Jesper S. <je...@no...>]

Tony Graham wrote:
> 
> So you have both a new FoDoc variant and a new Pango backend variant?
> Or just a FoDoc variant for the Win32 backend of Pango?
> 
I have both a new implementation of FoDoc and a new pango backend.

The reasons for the new pango version are:

* had to incorporate your xsl-attributes and layout changes
* pango-win32 assumed a coordinate system where (0,0) is in the upper left 
corner growing down for increasing Y, xmlroff/PDFLib uses the lower left corner 
for (0,0).

I also had to change area-to-pdf, since it used PDFLib, but I don't think that 
it would be to hard to avoid that. If that happens perhaps area-to-pdf could be 
renamed to something like render-area.[hc]?

Regards,
Jesper