Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] Leishmania implementation questions

[Kevin M. <km...@li...>]

Hey Dr. Dionisio,

Both these things are correct. The destination table is OrderedLocusNames
and L. Infantum does get its own species profile. No worries with the hold
ups, better safe than sorry!

Kevin McGee


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Dionisio, John David N. <
Joh...@lm...> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I know the full additional-column instructions haven't come down yet, but
> outside of that I looked into the new synonym-based approach for Leishmania
> and ended up with a couple of clarification questions:
>
> - The destination table name should still be OrderedLocusNames, yes?  I
> think this is the case but wanted to be sure.
>
> - L. infantum should still be a species profile in its own right, but with
> the exact same export logic (differing only in terms of the initial
> pattern), right?
>
> I have a degree of confidence that these details are in fact what I think
> they are, but enough doubt emerged when I started actually getting into the
> code that I ended up asking.  Sorry for the hold-up caused by this.
>
> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> Associate Director, University Honors Program
> Loyola Marymount University
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
>