[XMLPipeDB-developer] Gene ID names figured out
Brought to you by:
kdahlquist,
zugzugglug
From: Kevin M. <km...@li...> - 2014-02-18 19:32:11
|
Hey Dr. Dionisio, I think I have pretty much got the ID patterns figured out. Looking on GeneDB and Ensembl Protists, they have the pattern LmjF.##.#### as the correct way of formatting the id name. However, under synonyms, they have another pattern LmjF##.#### and have marked it as a previously known name. I think that these are the two patterns we want: the current up to date pattern and the previously known pattern just in case the user of the database has older data that was named in this way. This means that we should get rid of the pattern LmjF_##_#### entirely and add LmjF##.#### in its place. Also, typing in the random straggler names on Uniprot, they have synonymous names that follow the patterns in the coded in the database already: L1063.01 = LmjF23.0270 L3640.11 = LmjF21.1780 L374.02 = LmjF19.0670 LMAJ006828= LmjF06.1270 lmj_1130 = LmjF21.1780 I don't know if we should change there names or what we should do with them, but we do know they code for actual genes and it gives us the option of including them in the coding without having to make too many modifications. Let me know if you have any questions or want to meet to talk about it! -Kevin McGee |