Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] GM Builder post taxon merge
Brought to you by:
kdahlquist,
zugzugglug
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] GM Builder post taxon merge
|
From: Richard B. <rbr...@gm...> - 2011-04-15 07:04:38
|
No, unfortunetely i haven't done the query or looked at the original xml
file yet but those will be my first steps when I start digging into this
again tomorrow.
Richard
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:38 PM, John David N. Dionisio <do...@lm...>wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Did you do the aforementioned "lower level" investigation, which was to
> query all of the available taxon IDs directly from PostgreSQL, to see what
> taxon IDs were there?
>
> Alternatively, you can look at the original UniProt XML file that was
> imported into PostgreSQL, and examine the taxon IDs in that file.
>
> Essentially, the program won't match a species profile if that species
> profile's declared taxon ID cannot be found in the relational database. So,
> you need to know what taxon IDs found their way into the relational database
> to begin with, then work from there.
>
> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> Loyola Marymount University
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:22 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
>
> > Well that seemed to do the trick as I was able to export out a
> Mtuberculosis gdb which is very close to our baseline gdb from b63. I will
> post both gdb's onto the wiki along with an excel doc comparison of the
> original row counts.
> >
> > But I'm still unclear exactly why using the general species taxon id
> would work and the taxon id for our specific species would not work?
> >
> > Maybe I'm still a bit weak in my understanding, but it seemed to me that
> what we wanted to do was identify the species by its taxon id to eliminate
> issues with potentially different, non-exact spellings (and tracking) of
> particual species names.
> >
> > Can someone clarify please? ;-D
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Richard Brous <rbr...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > No intrusion Don =D
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give it a try and let the distribution
> know the findings.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Apr 14, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Don Murphy <djs...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> >> Forgive my intrusion, but I have an idea of what may be the problem. In
> the screenshot you provided, the only species shown in the drop down box, as
> taken from the source files, is taxon id 1773. An quick Google search
> reveals that 1773 is the general taxon id for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In
> the profile you created, the taxon id used is 83332, which is for M.
> tuberculosis strain H37Rv. The problem seems to be that the profile you
> created was for the certain strain, while your source files were for M.
> tuberculosis in general. Try changing the profile to use the id 1773 and see
> if that helps.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Richard Brous <rbr...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >> OK, found the method and reviewed it.
> >>
> >> It makes sense and I believe it should work as is unless I'm reading the
> code wrong.
> >>
> >> I don't see how if the taxon id is included in the Mtuberculosis species
> profile (which it is) why this shouldn't work?
> >>
> >> Help please, what am i missing?
> >>
> >> richard
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Richard Brous <rbr...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >> Gotcha, will check it out later today as well as post gdb's up to the
> wiki.
> >>
> >> Rb
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, "John David N. Dionisio" <do...@lm...>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Greetings,
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for the delay; I ended up digging through the code a bit so I
> would be sure of the response.
> >> >
> >> > getSpeciesProfilesFound does indeed feed the combo box that you want
> to touch, but it turns out that the array returned by this method is not
> built here.
> >> >
> >> > The code that builds the array returned by getSpeciesProfilesFound is
> located in UniProtDatabaseProfile; the method is called checkRequirements.
> This is the method that performs the query which retrieves the available
> taxon IDs from the relational database.
> >> >
> >> > The intent of the method is this: if a custom species profile is found
> that matches the taxon ID, then that species profile is added to the list.
> If a custom species profile is *not* found, a generic species profile
> initialized to the taxon ID is added instead.
> >> >
> >> > That is the method's intent. As you have seen, it may need some
> cleanup and/or fixing. But there it is for you:
> UniProtDatabaseProfile.checkRequirements.
> >> >
> >> > John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> > Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> > Loyola Marymount University
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> OK, in ExportPanel1.java i found the following:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. COMBOBOX DEFINED ON LINE 59
> >> >> private
> >> >>
> >> >> JComboBox speciesComboBox;
> >> >> 2. THEN COMBOBOX IS INSTANTIATED AND ACTION LISTENER ASSIGNED
> STARTING ON LINE 141
> >> >>
> >> >> // Species | JComboBox | speciesFound | JLabel | Description
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> // | JTextField | customizable name
> >> >>
> >> >> speciesComboBox = new JComboBox();
> >> >>
> >> >> speciesComboBox.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
> >> >>
> >> >> public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent arg0) {
> >> >> speciesProfileSelected(
> >> >>
> >> >> speciesComboBox.getSelectedItem());
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> });
> >> >>
> >> >> 3. NEXT CODE BLOCK ADJUSTS THE DATABASE PROFILE WHICH IS ALWAYS
> UNIPROT, THEN BASED ON DATABASE PROFILE
> >> >> IT POPULATES THE SPECIES COMBOBOX STARTING LINE 210
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> * Adjusts the dynamic content when a database profile is selected.
> >> >>
> >> >> *
> >> >>
> >> >> *
> >> >>
> >> >> @param selectedItem
> >> >> */
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> protected void databaseProfileSelected(Object selectedItem) {
> >> >>
> >> >> if (selectedItem instanceof DatabaseProfile) {
> >> >> DatabaseProfile selectedProfile = (DatabaseProfile)selectedItem;
> >> >>
> >> >> ExportToGenMAPP.setDatabaseProfile(selectedProfile);
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> profileDescriptionTextArea.setText(selectedProfile.getDescription());
> >> >>
> >> >> modSystemTextField.setText(selectedProfile.getMODSystem());
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> //This is populating the list of items in the speciesProfile combobox
> >> >>
> >> >> // based on what database was selected.
> >> >>
> >> >> speciesComboBox.removeAllItems();
> >> >>
> >> >> for (SpeciesProfile speciesProfile :
> selectedProfile.getSpeciesProfilesFound()) {
> >> >>
> >> >> speciesComboBox.addItem(speciesProfile);
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> SO I THINK THE METHOD I NEED TO SOURCE IS:
> selectedProfile.getSpeciesProfilesFound())
> >> >>
> >> >> SOUND GOOD SO FAR??
> >> >>
> >> >> Richard
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Richard Brous <rbr...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> OK, I'll look around and attempt to sniff out the code regarding
> populating the drop down menu on the first export screen.
> >> >>
> >> >> But that said, I was surprised it didn't work since the functionality
> 'seemed' to be in place for the two working species (P_a and S_a). And I
> noticed that the working species don't always show in the drop down box, so
> figured they likely aren't hard coded in.
> >> >>
> >> >> Richard
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:04 PM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Greetings,
> >> >>
> >> >> First off, recall that the taxon ID that is given to the species
> profile is not involved in building the dropdown menu; it is used to match
> the chosen taxon ID from that menu with a species profile to use. That
> dropdown menu is built from a database query that retrieves all available
> taxon IDs and species names in the PostgreSQL database.
> >> >>
> >> >> With that in mind, I would tackle this as follows:
> >> >>
> >> >> - First, track down the code that builds the data displayed in that
> JComboBox. It should be trackable from the wizard panel code. If you're
> having trouble finding it, let me know and I can take a stab at following
> the breadcrumbs, or you can ask Don.
> >> >>
> >> >> This code should ultimately lead you to the database query that
> derives the overall list of available taxon IDs and species names in the
> PostgreSQL database.
> >> >>
> >> >> - Now, armed with this database query, you can verify the validity of
> this query directly in PostgreSQL. Essentially you need to make sure that
> this query does indeed retrieve the list of all taxon IDs and species names
> that are present in the PostgreSQL database.
> >> >>
> >> >> If the query is correct, then the issue is in the way the JComboBox
> is put together. This may need a little more knowledge of Swing that you
> have, in which case send the issue my way and I can take a look.
> >> >>
> >> >> If the query is incorrect, then it should be corrected. If the Swing
> code is correct, then things should work. If the Swing code is also
> incorrect, then you are at the previous case, and the Swing code now needs
> to be addressed (safe in the knowledge that the data part has been fixed).
> >> >>
> >> >> Let me know how that plan sounds to you.
> >> >>
> >> >> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Apr 12, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Great, glad we are on the same page!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I went ahead and added the taxon id to the Mtuberculosis species
> profile, recompiled and initiated an export but the expected taxon id didn't
> show in the species drop down box.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The coded modified is (as shown above):
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> public MycobacteriumTuberculosisUniProtSpeciesProfile() {
> >> >>>
> >> >>> super("Mycobacterium tuberculosis", 83332,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "This profile customizes the GenMAPP Builder export for
> Mycobacterium Tuberculosis data loaded from a UniProt XML file.");
> >> >>> }
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Attached is a ss of the dialog box.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I also checked to make sure the species was listed in the
> UniProtDatabaseProfile and Mtuberculosis and the rest of the newer species
> are present.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Any idea where i should look next aside from assuring that the
> change is actually in my working build?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Richard
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:40 PM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi Rich,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks for the update. I agree that we can move past the merge
> stage now.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regarding the species constructor, yes, having the required change
> consist solely of the addition of the taxon ID really was the goal.
> "Separation of concerns" and "don't repeat yourself" and all that :) Note
> how, in the end, the designation of the taxon ID is truly the only piece of
> additional information that is required of species profiles in order to get
> the work done. So, this ideal is reflected in the code.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Of course, there is a possibility that certain types of
> customizations may require additional work; however that depends on the type
> of customization involved and the way the species profile implements it. We
> can approach those on a per-species-profile basis.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I recreated a multispecies postgres db for P_aeruginosa and
> S_aureus and reimported the species xml files:
> >> >>>> P_aeruginosa UniProtXML
> >> >>>> P_aeruginosa goa
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> S_aureus UniProtXML
> >> >>>> S_aureus goa
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> GO xml
> >> >>>> processed go data
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I then exported P_aeruginosa .gdb using both Don's name2taxon code
> and the new trunk (b64): both gdb's original row counts are identical
> >> >>>> Also exported S_aureus using both Don's name2taxon code and the new
> trunk (b64) : both gdb's original row counts are identical
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I think we can safely say that Don's name2taxon changes are working
> at the point where he left off and the successful merge into the trunk is
> now verfied.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> =============================================================================
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Now to move to species I am familiar with and ensure they still
> match the base line gdb's generated from b63.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The first species I will work on is Mtuberculosis. From the readme
> file of the gdb previously posted, the taxon id is 83332.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I will go ahead and make the change to the Mtuberculosis species
> profile which is to add the taxon id in the form:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> public MycobacteriumTuberculosisUniProtSpeciesProfile() {
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> super("Mycobacterium tuberculosis", 83332,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> "This profile customizes the GenMAPP Builder export for
> Mycobacterium Tuberculosis data loaded from a UniProt XML file.");
> >> >>>> }
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> When comparing to S_aereus species profile, it was the only change
> to make in the Mtuberculosis species profile.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I rechecked my notes from this morning and don't see any other
> changes needed to enable our newer species to work with the post merge
> constructor.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I'll attempt an export tomorrow and see what happens.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Richard
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:51 PM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>> Follow the way the name2taxon “branch” was done. Put a gmbuilder/
> directory under tags/ if it is not already there, and make sure that the
> copied/tagged/branched subdirectory under that corresponds to the top-level
> directory of a gmbuilder project (i.e., it contains the build.xml, other
> top-level directories, etc.).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Subversion copies are “cheap:” it is OK to copy deep trees of
> files. You only start using additional storage space if the files
> themselves get modified. Otherwise, they are just references to their
> original versions.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> ok, so should I start at the gmbuilder directory Or the src
> directory?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:42 AM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>>> Yes, in Subversion what they did is collapse both activities into
> a single operation called "Copy." Whether you use the copy as a branch for
> modifications, or use it as a tag for posterity, is left to the developer
> and not the system.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> This functional change is the subject of some debate in the
> community. Some folks still feel that "enforced" tags have their benefits.
> But in the end, this is how Subversion conducts things, so we'll just have
> to go with it.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>>>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>>>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ok, makes sense because when I went through the process (without
> clicking finish) there was really no difference between the two... not even
> a specification to say this this is a "tag" vs "branch" unless I can only do
> that in the comments.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:35 AM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> Yes, tags and branches are structurally identical in Subversion.
> The only difference between a “tag” and a “branch” is that the developers
> have agreed to *not* touch a tag after it has been copied out.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> In other words, “tags” and “branches” are only different in
> Subversion by consensus. The distinction is not system-enforced.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>>>>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>>>>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> tagging is really creating a new branch for posterity?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> You'll want to tag from the repository, since your local copy
> has been modified. If you issue the tag command from the SVN Repository
> Viewing perspective, that should happen server-side.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> If you want to play it really safe, you can even do the tagging
> from a completely separate Eclipse workspace that does not have your local
> copies loaded up.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>>>>>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>>>>>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Am I tagging in my local project or in the repository?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:51 AM, John David N. Dionisio <
> do...@lm...> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> Hi Rich,
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I think it's OK to commit to the trunk, with one tweak for easy
> management: before committing, copy out ("tag") what is in the trunk right
> now, and put it in /tags/gmbuilder/before-name2taxon-merge (or something
> like that). This way, you have an easy basis for comparison if you need to
> go back to how the trunk was before name2taxon came along.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Also, it will save some time if your before- and after- .gdbs
> are available. Running our own exports, while of course doable as you said,
> would require things like getting old versions, building them, etc.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Happy digital forensics...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> John David N. Dionisio, PhD
> >> >>>>>>>> Associate Professor, Computer Science
> >> >>>>>>>> Loyola Marymount University
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Richard Brous wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Started a new thread since this is Pfalciparum specific.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> I have double checked my manual merge to confirm that in fact
> my edits were correctly included for Mtuberculosis and Pfalciparum.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> So when running gdb exports for each I determined that in fact
> something broke in the merge.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Before I start digging into this further I want to ask a
> couple questions:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> 1. Should I commit the changes up to Sourceforge yet or leave
> them locally on my laptop while troubleshooting? I know we can revert to
> earlier versions if needed but wanted to be sure we were all on same page.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> 2. I have before and after exports of Mtuberculosis and
> Pfalciparum on my laptop. Would you like me to post them for review or will
> you be running your own anyway?
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Richard
> >> >>>>>>>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> >> >>>>>>>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> >> >>>>>>>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> >> >>>>>>>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> >> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>>>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>>>>>>> xml...@li...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> >> >>>>>>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> >> >>>>>>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> >> >>>>>>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>>>>>> xml...@li...
> >> >>>>>>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> >> >>>>>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> >> >>>>>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> >> >>>>>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>>>>> xml...@li...
> >> >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> >> >>>>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> >> >>>>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> >> >>>>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>>>> xml...@li...
> >> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> >> >>>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> >> >>>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> >> >>>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>>> xml...@li...
> >> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and
> minutes
> >> >>> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave
> Report as
> >> >>> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service
> providers.
> >> >>> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and
> vision.
> >> >>> Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >>> xml...@li...
> >> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>> <Tb_export_screen.jpg><ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and
> minutes
> >> >> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave
> Report as
> >> >> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service
> providers.
> >> >> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and
> vision.
> >> >> Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> >> xml...@li...
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and
> minutes
> >> > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report
> as
> >> > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> >> > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and
> vision.
> >> > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> > xml...@li...
> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and
> improve
> >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about
> boosting
> >> the value of server virtualization.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> xml...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and
> improve
> >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about
> boosting
> >> the value of server virtualization.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> >> xml...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
> >
> > <ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlpipedb-developer mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlpipedb-developer
>
|
