Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] Potential GMBuilder Windows 7 fix?
Brought to you by:
kdahlquist,
zugzugglug
From: Kam D. <kda...@lm...> - 2010-09-16 22:00:39
|
Hi, It's 64-bit. Dr. D At 12:58 PM 9/16/2010, you wrote: >For further reference, which version of Windows 7 is being used: >32-bit or 64-bit? > >Don Murphy > > > >From: Don Murphy <djs...@ya...> >To: xml...@li... >Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 6:33:29 PM >Subject: Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] Potential GMBuilder Windows 7 fix? > >Dang. Oh well, I'll keep looking for more leads on potential fixes. > >Don Murphy > > > >From: Kam Dahlquist <kda...@lm...> >To: "xml...@li..." ><xml...@li...> >Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 5:41:49 PM >Subject: Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] Potential GMBuilder Windows 7 fix? > >Hi, > >I went ahead and installed the package (for 32-bit, it wouldn't let >me install the 64-bit version because I only have 32-bit Office >installed). The installation completed OK. > >However, when I went to export a gdb, I got the exact same error as >before, so this did not fix the problem, unfortunately. > >Best, >Kam > >At 05:14 PM 9/15/2010, Don Murphy wrote: >>- I'm not sure, but judging by the numerous similar complaints I've >>found, that might be the case, especially if this fixes it. >> >>- It should use the same Odbc-Jdbc bridge name as we thought it >>would use and is currently used in gmbuilder for Windows 7. >> >>- As I haven't used the redistributable myself, I don't have an >>immediate answer for driver distribution through our release. I'll >>look into it further. >> >>Dr. Dahlquist, would you mind also telling us about installing the >>distributable when reporting the results of the test? With any >>luck, it may be a very simple installation that won't be too much >>of an inconvenience. Sorry again that I can't test this myself. >> >>Don Murphy >> >> >> >>From: John David N. Dionisio <do...@lm...> >>To: xml...@li... >>Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 4:46:06 PM >>Subject: Re: [XMLPipeDB-developer] Potential GMBuilder Windows 7 fix? >> >>Greetings all, >> >>I have some follow-up questions on this: >> >>- Does this mean that Microsoft no longer includes the Jet database >>library (or whatever they call it now) as a default part of Windows 7? >> >>- Under what Odbc-Jdbc bridge name would we be able to find this >>redistributable version of the driver? >> >>- I agree with Kam that, if this turns out to be the only way to >>go, it would be a serious inconvenience for our potential >>users. Might we be able to include the .dll as part of our own >>distribution? (with proper acknowledgments, of course) >> >>Don, please continue to investigate other possible solutions while >>Dr. Dahlquist gives the current one a shot. Thanks! >> >>John David N. Dionisio, PhD >>Associate Professor, Computer Science >>Loyola Marymount University >> >> >>On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Kam Dahlquist >><<mailto:kda...@lm...>kda...@lm...> wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'll give this a try tonight and see what happens. This would be >>>disappointing, though since anyone who wants to use our program on >>>Windows 7 will need this patch. >>> >>>Best, >>>Dr. D >>> >>>At 02:51 PM 9/15/2010, Don Murphy wrote: >>>>I've started searching for information on what could solve the >>>>issues GMBuilder has been having when loading through Windows 7. >>>>I'm not sure if this may deal with our issue, but running the >>>>Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Redistributable (which can >>>>be found here: >>>><http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=C06B8369-60DD-4B64-A44B-84B371EDE16D>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=C06B8369-60DD-4B64-A44B-84B371EDE16D >>>>) on the Windows 7 machine before attempting another export might >>>>solve the problem. >>>> >>>>Hope this helps. >>>> >>>>Don Murphy >> > > > |