xmlceclipse-development

Re: [XmlcEclipse-development] Changes.

[Garth D. <ga...@ut...>]

> Finally! I got my code working again, and I've committed them.  Two >
new features:
> 
> 1) You can now specify "Implements" in the properties (should be fully 
> qualified class name), or leave it blank.
> 2) You can now have different properties on differnt folders underneath 
> an Xmlc source folder.

That is good news indeed! 
 
> Garth - I took a look at your patches, and it would be a WHOLE lot 
> easier if they were submitted as actualy "patch" files.

Hmm... strange... before I was not able to get view the repository
anonymously through eclipse -> hence one of the reasons I didn't do patch 
format files...  I will try to figure out how to use this for diffs now
that it works...

> I'll probably build a new release either Sunday or Monday.

That's great news.   I'm going to fetch down what you just did and see if 
it helps me in what I'm trying to do (import a Barracuda sample project
using Eclipse without relying on Ant to build it).

> The next "big feature" I'll look into will be proper error 
> handling/reporting.

Good stuff.


Northern.CA ===--
http://www.northern.ca 
Canada's Search Engine

Re: [XmlcEclipse-development] Changes.

[Garth D. <ga...@ut...>]

> > Garth - I took a look at your patches, and it would be a WHOLE lot 
> > easier if they were submitted as actualy "patch" files.
> 
> Hmm... strange... before I was not able to get view the repository
> anonymously through eclipse -> hence one of the reasons I didn't do patch 
> format files...  I will try to figure out how to use this for diffs now
> that it works...

Turns out Eclipse is quite good at this stuff, it was a whole lot easier
then I thought, so now all the patches I submitted before have diffs.

TTYL,

-Garth

Northern.CA ===--
http://www.northern.ca 
Canada's Search Engine

Re: [XmlcEclipse-development] Changes.

[David C. <dc...@ma...>]

Yes it is,  I'll apply them today.

Garth Dahlstrom wrote:

>>>Garth - I took a look at your patches, and it would be a WHOLE lot 
>>>easier if they were submitted as actualy "patch" files.
>>>      
>>>
>>Hmm... strange... before I was not able to get view the repository
>>anonymously through eclipse -> hence one of the reasons I didn't do patch 
>>format files...  I will try to figure out how to use this for diffs now
>>that it works...
>>    
>>
>
>Turns out Eclipse is quite good at this stuff, it was a whole lot easier
>then I thought, so now all the patches I submitted before have diffs.
>
>TTYL,
>
>-Garth
>
>Northern.CA ===--
>http://www.northern.ca 
>Canada's Search Engine
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
>SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
>http://www.vasoftware.com
>_______________________________________________
>Xmlceclipse-development mailing list
>Xml...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlceclipse-development
>
>  
>