From: David C. <dc...@ma...> - 2003-01-27 23:32:31
|
Garth Dahlstrom wrote: >On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:40:53 -0500 David Corbin wrote: > > > >>Fair enough, though I'm tempted to simply put in "README_TO_INSTALL" >>file in there instead. People should use Update Manager. >> >> >> > >Update manager is the way to go, but I know it does not work well >at my work (thanks to our Microsoft proxy and eclipse's crappy >support for > Can you elaborate on this? > if we go that way with the README_TO_INSTALL >as the file for the latest release you might just want to through in >a quick word about manually installing the update manager files off that >are in: http://xmlceclipse.sourceforge.net/site/plugins/ > >I still think it would be a good idea to stick the release on there >every once and in a while, otherwise folks will think the project is >dead when web browsing (even though they may be able to get a >new version through updater). But maybe a pointer to the Wiki >in the README file could do the same. > >-G > >Northern.CA ===-- >http://www.northern.ca >Canada's Search Engine > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com >_______________________________________________ >Xmlceclipse-development mailing list >Xml...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlceclipse-development > > > |