From: Wolfgang K. <wol...@gm...> - 2006-08-02 08:31:40
|
Arno, for the same reason (external dependencies) I would not recommend adding t= his target to our "official" build script. My suggestion is to create a "p= rivate" build script for this, which is not part of the official distribut= ion. For this you can start with the gateway-targets file and modify the c= lasspaths. To use this file you can simply call "ant -f my-build.xml run-l= ocal". What do you think=3F Would you prefer to have that run-local target in the o= fficial build script=3F As long as this target is not called, that would not= cause problems (as the dependencies in Eclipse do). -- Frusty > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: XML11 Developer List <xml...@li...> > Gesendet: 02.08.06 10:14:18 > An: xml...@li... > Betreff: [XML11-devel] Request to Frusty: ant target run-local >=20 > Frusty, >=20 > I'm currently looking into the bug you have posted and would like to=20 > make a request for a new ant-target. As you know, XMLOB and XMLVM are=20 > bundled in XML11 and the run-target references these jar files. When=20 > debugging XMLVM, the development cycle is rather tedious: make a change=20 > in XMLVM, generate a new JAR file, copy it over to XML11/lib and re-run=20 > XML11. Under the assumption that XML11, XMLVM, and XMLOB are all checked= =20 > out into the same directory, would it be possible to create a=20 > 'run-local' target that references XMLVM not through=20 > XML11/lib/xmlvm.jar, but by adding ../xmlvm/ to the classpath=3F >=20 > That would make my life a lot easier... >=20 > Arno >=20 > PS. > I'm already doing this under Eclipse with a local launch configuration=20 > that follows the same idea. The reason I have not committed this launch=20 > configuration is to avoid external dependencies that would otherwise not= =20 > be necessary. >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------= - > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share = your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php=3Fpage=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDEVDE= V > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > XML11-devel mailing list > XML...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xml11-devel >=20 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/=3Fmc=3D021193 |
From: Wolfgang K. <wol...@gm...> - 2006-08-02 08:44:13
|
Ok - I put it on my todo list for tonight =A7;-) -- Frusty > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: XML11 Developer List <xml...@li...> > Gesendet: 02.08.06 10:39:57 > An: XML11 Developer List <xml...@li...> > Betreff: Re: [XML11-devel] Request to Frusty: ant target run-local >=20 > Wolfgang Korn wrote: > > for the same reason (external dependencies) I would not recommend addi= ng this target to our "official" build script. My suggestion is to create = a "private" build script for this, which is not part of the official distr= ibution. For this you can start with the gateway-targets file and modify t= he classpaths. To use this file you can simply call "ant -f my-build.xml r= un-local". > >=20 > > What do you think=3F Would you prefer to have that run-local target in t= he official build script=3F As long as this target is not called, that would= not cause problems (as the dependencies in Eclipse do). >=20 > I would prefer to have this part of the distribution. As long as no one=20 > calls this target, nothing bad will happen. And I really need this thing= =20 > all the time, so to have it in the repository, perhaps even sharing=20 > classpath etc. with the public run-target, would be of great benefit.=20 > And, as you pointed out, unlike the Eclipse launch configuration, this=20 > will not cause any problems. >=20 > Arno >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------= - > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share = your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php=3Fpage=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DDEVDE= V > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > XML11-devel mailing list > XML...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xml11-devel >=20 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! http://smartsurfer.web.de/=3Fmc=3D100071&distributionid=3D000000000071 |
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2006-08-02 08:39:44
|
Wolfgang Korn wrote: > for the same reason (external dependencies) I would not recommend adding this target to our "official" build script. My suggestion is to create a "private" build script for this, which is not part of the official distribution. For this you can start with the gateway-targets file and modify the classpaths. To use this file you can simply call "ant -f my-build.xml run-local". > > What do you think? Would you prefer to have that run-local target in the official build script? As long as this target is not called, that would not cause problems (as the dependencies in Eclipse do). I would prefer to have this part of the distribution. As long as no one calls this target, nothing bad will happen. And I really need this thing all the time, so to have it in the repository, perhaps even sharing classpath etc. with the public run-target, would be of great benefit. And, as you pointed out, unlike the Eclipse launch configuration, this will not cause any problems. Arno |