As I haven't managed to make time to set up my build environment I thought it's best if I give you access to apply the patch if you wish. If you'd like me to withdraw access afterwards I'm happy to do so. It would be worth bumping the version number too. Thanks again for your help.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Sorry, you're quite right. I will handle it at my end. Need to see why
version is defined in multiple locations. Don't want to break automated
builds by releasing a version that does not increment version correctly.
As I haven't managed to make time to set up my build environment I thought it's best if I give you access to apply the patch if you wish. If you'd like me to withdraw access afterwards I'm happy to do so. It would be worth bumping the version number too. Thanks again for your help.
I'm very sorry not to have addressed your patch sooner. Let me try to sort
out access for you so we can merge your change.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 at 12:33 Roger Leigh rleigh@users.sf.net wrote:
Related
Bugs: #221
You can give me access and revoke it afterward if you wish. However, is this strictly necessary for a trivial null pointer initialisation fix?
Sorry, you're quite right. I will handle it at my end. Need to see why
version is defined in multiple locations. Don't want to break automated
builds by releasing a version that does not increment version correctly.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 16:58 Roger Leigh rleigh@users.sf.net wrote:
Related
Bugs: #221
Fixed in 1.2.1.5:mac_port. Will be merged shortly.