From: <aur...@fr...> - 2003-07-05 10:01:17
|
Leandro Lucarella wrote: >Sure, I think the biggest problem to solve now is the way to use >interfaces. Specially because "implementation" association in umbrello >is not working fine (I can't implement a interface in two different >classes). Should we use realization? Should we try a newest version of > Well, i check i my "UML Bible" that is "UML en action" from Eyrolles,=20 and they uses the stereotype to precise what class is an interface. So i will use this = to. The problem you talk about (interface in two different classes) is not=20 very cool :-( >umbrello (I'm using 1.1.1)? > I got this version too (i'm under Debian sid too), and i try to build=20 "kdesdk" from cvs head yesterday night without sucess. Will try again now after a new update...=20 there is a lot of commit since 1.1.1, though. > >- -- >LUCA - Leandro Lucarella - Usando Debian GNU/Linux Sid - GNU Generation >- ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >E-Mail / JID: lu...@lu... >GPG Fingerprint: D9E1 4545 0F4B 7928 E82C 375D 4B02 0FE0 B08B 4FB2 >GPG Key: gpg --keyserver pks.lugli.org.ar --recv-keys B08B4FB2 >- ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >Este pobre clam=C3=B3 y Dios lo oy=C3=B3. >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQE/BniiSwIP4LCLT7IRAuSfAKCFLQA5G2HacbwPhUe+whnSs0QoYwCfWJod >7fM65bgzRubb/ivW2JbOBW8=3D >=3DPxPI >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > =20 > Aurelien |