From: Eduard Hasenleithner <eduardh@ao...> - 2001-07-24 12:58:49
Hi busy developer.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:37:29PM +0200, Daniel Caujolle-Bert wrote:
> Is there any objection to turn on DXR3 check by
> default in configure stage, this solve rpm packages build
> problems for me.
I have no objections, but with the configure as it is now,
the configuration stops when no em8300.h is present (or can be found).
My intention was to give the user (maybe rookie) a chance of knowing
why dxr3 don't gets compiled in.
Maybe we should just make a
*** dxr3 not activated due to missing em8300.h
in the configure output. But I have close to zero experience with
Salzburg University of Applied Sciences and Technologies
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.