Description: On Mac OS 10.6.8, after updating from TeX Live 2012 (MacTeX 2012) to TeX Live 2013 (MacTeX 2013), I’ve encountered several issues with some AAT features. I’ve encountered all of them with swashes, but I have no doubt some can be triggered with other features.
aat-info.tex
.I don’t know if these issue are linked or not. Feel free to split them up as you see fit.
Nota:
I’m certainly wrong about the results I expect from time to time, I’m a complete XeTeX and AAT newbie.
Context:
Preliminaries:
The files listed below are all enclosed in the archive.tar.bz2. The following expects the archive to be untared into /Users/John/Public.
Structure of the archive
The archive contains the following directories:
aat-info.*.pdf
typeset by myself, for reference:aat-info.chancery.2012.en.pdf
is aat-info.tex
set to Apple Chancery, typeset by John with xetex2012aat-info.chancery.2012.fr.pdf
by François with xetex2012aat-info.chancery.2013.en.pdf
by John with xetex2013aat-info.chancery.2013.fr.pdf
by François with xetex2013 (this is the interesting one)For convenience, files named copy-paste-me.{fr,en}.sh
are provided with the shell command to copy paste into a terminal, not to be run directly.
Steps to reproduce:
cd /Users/John/Public/archiveline-swashes
alias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
alias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
xetex2012 --job line-swashes.2012 line-swashes.tex
which generates line-swashes.2012.log
and line-swashes.2012.pdf
xetex2013 --job line-swashes.2013 line-swashes.tex
which generates line-swashes.2013.log
and line-swashes.2013.pdf
Actual results
line-swashes.2012.pdf
displays (twice, once for defaults, once for explicit features):line-swashes.2013.pdf
displays:Expected results
Both line-swashes.2012.pdf
and line-swashes.2013.pdf
display, twice:
* Line Initial Swashes (You)
* Line Final Swashes (there)
* [unsure] No swash in the middle of a line (I saw, You saw)
Steps to reproduce issue 2:
cd /Users/John/Public/archivelanguage-dep
alias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
alias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
xetex2012 --job language-dep.2012.en language-dep.tex
which generates language-dep.2012.en.log
and language-dep.2012.en.pdf
xetex2013 --job language-dep.2013.en language-dep.tex
which generates language-dep.2013.en.log
and language-dep.2013.en.pdf
cd /Users/John/Public/archivelanguage-dep
alias xetex2012=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2012.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
alias xetex2013=/Library/TeX/Distributions/TeXLive-2013.texdist/Contents/Programs/texbin/xetex
xetex2012 --job language-dep.2012.fr language-dep.tex
which generates language-dep.2012.fr.log
and language-dep.2012.fr.pdf
xetex2013 --job language-dep.2013.fr language-dep.tex
which generates language-dep.2013.fr.log
and language-dep.2013.fr.pdf
Actual results:
The archive contains the results I obtain on my part.
language-dep.fr.2013.log
complain about `Parafes=Parafes en fin de mot'language-dep.fr.2013.log
complains about `Smart Swashes=Word Final Swashes'language-dep.2012.{fr,en}.pdf
both look the same:language-dep.2013.{fr,en}.pdf
look different but share:Expected results:
language-dep.2013.fr.pdf
and language-dep.2013.en.pdf
are identicallanguage-dep.2013.{fr,en}.pdf
have:
Anonymous
This still happens on OS X 10.9.0.
I cannot test this on a Mac. On Linux, it should be noted that extracting the archive requires unusual options:
$ tar --delay-directory-restore -xvjf archive.tar.bz2
. I cannot reproduce anything else. To debug this further on non-Mac, please provide us with a URL to downloadApple Chancery
from, and if some font file renaming is needed, please say what to rename and how.Last edit: Just A. Man 2020-07-13
I’ll try to reproduce on my curernt setup, but that probably won't be before this week end or the next. As for making the font available for download, I’ll have to check the licence, but I’m guessing that will be complicated. If I’m able to reproduce, I’ll probably need to find another font that is concerned as well.