|
From: <red...@pr...> - 2003-12-10 15:42:10
|
Hi All, sorry to be late but there had been a lot happening in here. Just a couple of things. XML Parser is not defined YET, as that is not my expertise area I hope someone can send me some pointers to start evaluating (I will be able only to evaluate based on Code Readability, and Learning Curve, nothing else). However always remember that our design principle is Performance dont Matters if Code Readability suffers too much... (You can always optimize -meke code ugly- later if you really need to)... About what to look for XML, if anyone can find a good, active, stable, small and simple XML Parser just let me know (bahh if you find that, we have found our XML Parser :D ), so just send the pointers... I have heard about TinyXML (last message) and Xerces (from Apache), I will take a look at them when I get a some spare Internet Time... After XMas for sure (will be online 24/7). Greetings Red Knight Quoting Chris Phillips <chr...@ju...>: > > I'm open to other suggestions on XML parsers. If anyone knows of > any others, go ahead and list them. I think smaller would be better. > It should keep as small of a memory footprint as possible. Execution > speed isn't really a factor (IMO). > > chrisp > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:52:47 -0500 "Jeremy" <dr...@cf...> writes: > > FYI, it looks like you've already decided on an XML parser, but I > > have > > experience using TinyXML and it's very simple and quick. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/tinyxml Just thought I'd throw that > > out > > there > > > > Jeremy > > > > > > |