It is redundant, yes. It snuck in when we introduced
@ejb:persistence as a synonym for various app server
tags like @weblogic:column-name. We should remove
the need for @ejb:persistent-field now.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xdoclet-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:xdoclet-user-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On
Behalf Of David Ward
> Sent: 20. juni 2002 22:58
> To: Xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Xdoclet-user] @ejb:persistence vs.
@ejb:persistence-field
>
>
> Why do I need to use
>
> @ejb:persistent-field
>
> on a method that I already use
>
> @ejb:persistence column-name="FOO"
>
> on? It seems redundant.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by:
> ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
>
_______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> Xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user