From: Raul F. <rfa...@gm...> - 2012-09-03 10:24:00
|
Hello Uwe, it is related to two issues I reported back in the beginning of the year. <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28809703> One is the size of the buffer, which we had just above. The other is: While porting the cable's implementation to another system, I noticed that the assumption of bursts of more than 32 bits to be aligned is false as long as the burst is not multiple of 32 (64 is ok but 63 has to be realigned). I assumed that it happens seldom, possibly because the application does not use bursts on non-32-multiple numbers. But there might be an exception. Take a look on the port where I commented it: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28809703 <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28809703> Some followups: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28824266 Best regards, Raul On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Uwe Bonnes < bo...@el...> wrote: > >>>>> "Raul" == Raul Fajardo <rfa...@gm...> writes: > > Raul> Hi Egnor, For some more speed, you can safely use 1<<11. > > Raul> The explanation of what is going on is somewhat complicated but > it > Raul> works and kind of makes sense from a cpld implementation point of > Raul> view. > > Raul, please give that explanation. It will be archived on the mailing list > or I will add a not in the code. > > Raul> <p>Hi Egnor,</p> <p>For some more speed, you can safely use > Please, no HTML and no full quote on mailing lists. I clutters the > archives... > > Dan, can you test Raul's proposal and report back? > > Bye > -- > Uwe Bonnes bo...@el... > > Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt > --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ---------- > |