Re: [Xbyamp-develop] xbmp/yamp merge status

[<tr...@ap...>]

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Albert Soler wrote:

> I don't wish to get into a protracted debate so I'll sumarise by saying that
> this was a concession I asked Frodo to make if we merged both projects (as
> it turns out this happened a lot quicker, and it looked like a .62 build of

> In any case, after the 14th Dec the project reverts to daily updates to the
> CVS ala yamp.

I see absolutely no reason for this to happen at a specific date, or why 
it can't happen now. Why did you ask Frodo for this? 

One of the reasons I choose to code for yamp instead of xbmp was that the 
authors behind xbmp didn't seem to care a bit about open sorce 
development. With the source in the CVS I don't see why you're withholding 
other parts - is it about _control_? Being the only ones able to put a 
binary together?

Please explain, maybe you have rational reasons after all.

/me - professional software developer

-- 

- I support the Palestinians, and so would you if you opened your eyes