Re: [Xbae-discuss] Non-debug library

[James E. F. <jf...@ac...>]

Cool. Those patches are just about identical to the ones I
was going to send you. :-) By the way, what version of
autoconf et al are you using?
-James

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Danny Backx wrote:

> That should indeed be sufficient.
>
> Do note that the debug code is not all that much of a performance
> penalty. The first thing it does is check the existance of
> a macro (which you can set with
> 	setenv XBAE_DEBUG_SOURCES Methods.c:Matrix.c
> ), then it checks whether the current debug statement
> is from a source in the list, etc.
>
> But indeed, what you say will do the trick.
>
> I've just committed some stuff to CVS, hopefully that
> works for you.
>
> 	Danny
>
> "James E. Flemer" wrote:
> >
> > [ Not subscribed. Please CC. ]
> >
> > I saw in the archives that the DEBUGOUT() etc was taken
> > from lesstif, and that there is no --enable-production flag
> > for configure yet. It seems that the debug stuff was
> > changed at least 7 months ago (6 releases ago). I'd like to
> > build the library without the debug code. It looks like all
> > I'd need to do is patch configure.in and acconfig.h to
> > define LESSTIF_PRODUCTION (or do it by hand). Will that be
> > sufficient? Is there anything else I need to do/check? If I
> > do it the real way (autoconf) I'll send a patch.
>
>