Re: [X10-developers] TM implementation

[thanumalayan m. <mad...@gm...>]

Hi

The current implementation seems to translate atomic blocks directly
into java synchronized blocks - correct me if I am wrong, and this
seems to be something done in one xcd file. Would it be wise to write
some code for an actual TM implementation right now, or wait till some
other features of X10 are implemented? Any idea?

Regards,
Thanumalayan S

On 4/12/08, Vijay Saraswat <vi...@sa...> wrote:
> I have not heard of an implementation. We have talked of one, but no
> code yet. Which TM implementation are you planning to start with?
>
> Best,
> Vijay
>
> thanumalayan mad wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Im beginning to work on a TM implementation that supports parallel
> > transactions in X10. Anybody knows if someone has already done this
> before?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thanumalayan S
> >
> >
>
>
>