From: Ed H. <ed...@do...> - 2005-04-23 04:09:08
|
Should anything have changed about the behavior of wxVERSION_STRING recently? Using CVS WxPerl 0.23, I get: Error while autoloading 'Wx::wxVERSION_STRING' at Launch/Activate.pm line 304 I did a little test and got the same error: ed$ wxPerl -e 'use Wx; use Wx qw(wxVERSION_STRING); print wxVERSION_STRING."\n";' Error while autoloading 'Wx::wxVERSION_STRING' at -e line 1 I might try reverting to 0.22 and see if this error was there or is just in 0.23/CVS -- now that I know how to solve the 'slider.h' issue I should be able to get 0.22 compiling. (My first reaction to the 'slider.h' problem compiling 0.22 was to go try 0.23 and see if it was fixed. When that didn't work, I turned on my brain and fixed it myself. :) |
From: Ed H. <ed...@do...> - 2005-04-23 04:15:40
|
To confirm: this problem does not occur in 0.22, just in 0.23CVS (which is a good reason for now for me to stick to 0.22 for the moment -- I'm sure I'll have enough amusing surprises dealing with the effects of 2.6.0 on my code without worrying about upgrading wxPerl at the same time. :) On Apr 23, 2005, at 12:08 AM, Ed Heil wrote: > Should anything have changed about the behavior of wxVERSION_STRING > recently? > > Using CVS WxPerl 0.23, I get: > > Error while autoloading 'Wx::wxVERSION_STRING' at Launch/Activate.pm > line 304 > > I did a little test and got the same error: > > ed$ wxPerl -e 'use Wx; use Wx qw(wxVERSION_STRING); print > wxVERSION_STRING."\n";' > Error while autoloading 'Wx::wxVERSION_STRING' at -e line 1 > > I might try reverting to 0.22 and see if this error was there or is > just in 0.23/CVS -- now that I know how to solve the 'slider.h' issue > I should be able to get 0.22 compiling. (My first reaction to the > 'slider.h' problem compiling 0.22 was to go try 0.23 and see if it was > fixed. When that didn't work, I turned on my brain and fixed it > myself. :) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > wxperl-users mailing list > wxp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users |
From: Mattia B. <mat...@li...> - 2005-04-23 14:21:35
|
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:08:58 -0400 Ed Heil <ed...@do...> wrote: Hello, > Should anything have changed about the behavior of wxVERSION_STRING > recently? Yes, I changed the handling of string constants, and I got wrong just this one. Fixed this and the missing wx/slider.h. Thanks! Mattia |
From: Mark D. <mar...@zn...> - 2005-04-23 16:34:28
|
Is sourceforge CVS slow to update? The latest files I can see are 13 April 2005 ? Or am I looking in the wrong place. (cvs as per wesite) Mattia Barbon wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:08:58 -0400 Ed Heil <ed...@do...> wrote: > > Hello, > > >>Should anything have changed about the behavior of wxVERSION_STRING >>recently? > > > Yes, I changed the handling of string constants, and I got wrong > just this one. Fixed this and the missing wx/slider.h. > > Thanks! > Mattia > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > wxperl-users mailing list > wxp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users > > |
From: Mattia B. <mat...@li...> - 2005-04-23 20:55:56
|
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:34:15 +0100 Mark Dootson <mar...@zn...> wrote: Hello, > Is sourceforge CVS slow to update? The latest files I can see are 13 > April 2005 ? > > Or am I looking in the wrong place. (cvs as per wesite) SF.net CVS used to point to different servers for anonymous vs. authenticated access. I have no idea if this is still the case and, if this is the case, how muche the servers take to synchronize. Regards Mattia |
From: Mark D. <mar...@zn...> - 2005-04-23 21:08:06
|
Mattia, Many thanks. For info, it seems to take somewhere between 2 and 3 hours for updates to propagate to the anonymous servers. Which is pretty good if I'd considered the traffic involved. Once again - many thanks for wxPerl Regards Mark Mattia Barbon wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:34:15 +0100 Mark Dootson <mar...@zn...> wrote: > > Hello, > > >>Is sourceforge CVS slow to update? The latest files I can see are 13 >>April 2005 ? >> >>Or am I looking in the wrong place. (cvs as per wesite) > > > SF.net CVS used to point to different servers for anonymous vs. > authenticated access. I have no idea if this is still the case and, > if this is the case, how muche the servers take to synchronize. > > Regards > Mattia > > > |