wxperl-users

Re: [wxperl-users] Activestate and WxPerl

[Mattia B. <mb...@ds...>]

> Worked like a charm my man.  Thanks
> 
> I don't understand, I'm new to Perl (on windows, compiled/used a fair amount
> on *nix).  I understand all you need to M$ C compiler to compile perl on
FYI: perl can be compiled both with MinGW ( www.mingw.org, it's free )
and Borland C ( there is a free version for download ).

> windows.  But I thought you had to use activestate if  you wanted ppm.  What
> is your repository?

Regards
Mattia

[wxperl-users] Latest stable versions of wxPerl and wsWindows

[James L. <jl...@bi...>]

Hi Mattia,
Having been sidetracked for some time, I'm about to get on with a serious
wxPerl/wxWindows application.  Before starting, can you tell me the latest
stable and compatible versions of wxPerl and wxWindows, please?

A few months ago, we were discussing Perl validators - has anyone made
progress on this?  If not, I'm happy to develop pure Perl validators as part
of my development.  Let me know what you think.

Regards,

James

Re: [wxperl-users] Latest stable versions of wxPerl and wsWindows

[Mattia B. <mb...@ds...>]

On Thu, 16 May 2002, James Lavery wrote:

>Hi Mattia,
>Having been sidetracked for some time, I'm about to get on with a serious
>wxPerl/wxWindows application.  Before starting, can you tell me the latest
>stable and compatible versions of wxPerl and wxWindows, please?
wxPerl 0.10 & wxWindows 2.2.9; there are binary releases for
Win32 & Linux ( RPM & DEB )

>A few months ago, we were discussing Perl validators - has anyone made
>progress on this?  If not, I'm happy to develop pure Perl validators as part
>of my development.  Let me know what you think.
No one did it, so I'll be glad if you can do it.

Regards
Mattia