Re: [wxperl-users] PPM trouble (doesn't heart to visit the archives) (ppmplus anybody?)

[DH <cra...@ya...>]

true that.
the PPM modules aren't bad,
but the shell continues to suck,
and it's hard to fix ~ i guess someone ought to write a better one
(ppmplus anybody?)

--- Mattia Barbon <mb...@ds...> wrote:
> > It doesn't hurt to visit the archives
> > 
> > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/8008/0/9809093/
> 
> I agree, but nonetheless this should be fixed (I, personally,
> would be very annoyed if a package installation would not work[1]).
> 
> Regards
> Mattia
> 
> [1] not that I use PPM that much, though...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> wxperl-users mailing list
> wxp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com