Re: [wxperl-users] FW: SPUG: Windows Applications in Perl

[James L. <jl...@bi...>]

I've got wxPerl, wxWindows and Perl2Exe going together, to give a very good
GUI for Perl (having used Tk extensively in the past).

Usually the problem is, as Simon Flack says, that there are missing DLLs.

One thing to be careful of is that the compiled EXE can work on your build
machine, but not on a different one, because some things still get resolved
in your PATH.  I found I had to test by swapping Perl out of my PATH, then
running the EXE, just to make sure.

Also, I remember running Perl2Exe in verbose mode (can't remember the
switch, -v maybe), which shows all the modules/dependencies it is picking
up.

If you post error messages etc., I'll see what I can do to help.

James


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc M. Adkins" <Mar...@Do...>
To: <wxp...@li...>
Sent: 13 September 2002 17:42
Subject: [wxperl-users] FW: SPUG: Windows Applications in Perl


> >From Seattle Perl User's Group list...the comment about Perl2Exe was kind
of
> interesting...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: SPUG: Windows Applications in Perl
>
> I have been looking into ways of making Windows GUI applications
> with Perl and haven't found any good options yet.
>
> [...snip...]
>
> wxPerl looks much nicer (it has the native Windows L-n-F) but for
> some reason Perl2Exe does not build the final script.exe
> correctly if I use WxPerl.
>
> [...snip...]
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> wxperl-users mailing list
> wxp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users