Re: [wxperl-users] Alternate names for Wx::CGI

[David K. <da...@po...>]

the module is a nice idea.  but i agree with the others that "CGI"
doesn't belong in the name anywhere.  what the module does is introduce
a new coding style to Wx, emulating the coding style of CGI.pm, but this
style has also been incorporated into other modules, CGI::Application
and HTML::Template to name just two.

Everett, Toby <TEv...@AL...> wrote:
> How about:
> * Wx::NamedParameters
> * Wx::NamedParams

i like both of these.  i like NamedParams a bit better but I know that
the namespace maintainers prefer to avoid abbreviated words like
"params", so my vote would have to go to Wx::NamedParameters.

> * Wx::LikeCGI
> * Wx::AsCGI
>
> Or we could define a whole namespace (anyone want to write a Tk
> layer:).
> * Wx::Compatability::CGI
> * Wx::Compatability::Tk
> * Wx::Compatability::Win32GUI

again, Wx, even using your module is still not "compatible" with any of
those technolgies.  are you writing "syntax flavor" modules that emulate
Tk and Win32::GUI as well??

maybe: Wx::SyntaxStyle::CGI?  or Wx::CodeFlavor::CGI would be more
descriptive?

:-) <-these-> :-) mean that i am :-) <-Just Kidding-> :-)

--dave