From: Mattia B. <mb...@ds...> - 2002-08-26 19:08:03
|
> I'll make a start for this soon and would like to invite everyone to > contribute. My experience is that the wxWindows docs themselves are not > quite what you're looking for while building a wxPerl application, > because it's not always clear wether a function or class is implemented The "implemented class" part is not that difficult; the "implemented function" part should be doable (automatically); which way should implemented/not implemented classes/dunctions be marked? > in wxPerl or not, what parameters wxPerl expects and so on. If you could sketch some way to make parameter wxPerl expects, or whatever, clearer, *and* if this can be made automatically (i.e. by a script), I could incorporate this in the docs. Regards Mattia |