From: Mattia B. <mb...@ds...> - 2002-07-04 16:36:40
|
> Hi Mattia, > I've started coding a generic and a text validator for wxPerl, as I want to > use them in my project. > > Would you (or others) be interested in these being contributed to the wxPerl > community? If so, how do we want to manage it - as part of wxPerl, or just > a contribution to CPAN? Well, the rule I will try to follow is that wxPerl should only contain things that are in wxWindows; since wxValidators are in wxWindows I think your creatins belong to wxPerl > With regard to package naming, I'm intending to name them as follows: > Wx::Perl::GenericValidator > Wx::Perl::TextValidator > etc... Yes, that's what we afreed last time that was discussed > I'm intending the TextValidator validation to be controlled mainly by a > regexp to validate against, to make it flexible, but also to match the > features of the native wxValidator, if possible (though a lot of these can > be achieved by a regexp, I think). > Other suggestions/opinions regarding naming conventions are welcome - > nothing's cast in stone yet! Yes, one ( *suggestion* ): do not implement Wx::Perl::GenericValidator, as we discussed last time, there is ( almost ) no hope to implement it in Perl; and besides, the interface is quite broken IMHO; I *think* it is better to have something different from Wx::GV, either Wx::Perl::IntegerV, Wx::Perl::StringV, Wx::Perl::RealV, etc or Wx::Perl::ListBoxV, Wx::Perl::ComboBoxV, Wx::Perl::RadioBoxV, etc Of course these are suggestions, not necessarily right nor necessarily useful, just yjrowing some ideas... Regards Mattia |