Re: [wxperl-users] wxPerl binary for wxWindows 2.3.x?

[James L. <jl...@bi...>]

Hi Mattia,
Thanks for the info.

I was wanting to use wxPerl and wxWindows 2.2.9, as these are regarded as
stable.

Any knowledge as to how stable wxPerl 0.11b and wxWindows 2.3.3 are? (I
should probably post this to wxWindows discussion group, as well).

I will be needing to ship copies of my applic to several people, so don't
want to have to keep shipping patches to wxWindows, if possible.

Of course, I 'm probalby caught between a rock and a hard place slightly -
if I want the extra functionality/fixes in wxWindows 2.3.3, I'll have to
take the potential hit on new bugs!

James

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mattia Barbon" <mb...@ds...>
To: "James Lavery" <jl...@bi...>
Cc: <wxp...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [wxperl-users] wxPerl binary for wxWindows 2.3.x?


> On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, James Lavery wrote:
>
> >Hi Guys
> >
> >I'm currently using wxPerl 0.10 with wxWindows 2.2.9.
> >
> >However, I've got a problem with bitmap alignment in toolbar buttons,
which
> >I believe is fixed in wx 2.3.x. (According to Robert Roebling)
> >
> >I suppose I'll have to build a wxWindows 2.3.2 binary myself, and rebuild
> >wxPerl on top of it, won't I?  Unless someone can tell me different...!
> For Win32: http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~mbarbon/wx/
> Compiled against wxWindows 2.3.3-to-be
>
> For other OSs, yes;
>
> Regards
> Mattia
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                       >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
>
> _______________________________________________
> wxperl-users mailing list
> wxp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxperl-users