|
From: Eric W. <scr...@gm...> - 2007-04-28 22:12:40
|
# from Mattia Barbon
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 02:31 pm:
>=A0 The trouble (as usual) is finding somebody to do it. =A0I remember it
>took me a whole weekend (when everything went smoothly) to make a
>wxPerl binary release for RedHat, Win32 and OS X Panther+Tiger. =A0I
>also remember I anticipated with (almost) fear every wxPerl release,
>and I am much more relaxed now that I decided not to provide binaries
>myself.
The dotReader binary releases haven't been any sort of walk in the park. =20
A build Module::Build subclass which bundles everything into a=20
build+push scheme has been very helpful.
Perhaps if the wxPerl dist/svn included a build tool that could create=20
and upload (via svn/ftp?) a PAR for the given platform then volunteers=20
could handle the per-platform deps and QC? Maybe even nightly builds?
Of course, getting that all setup and tested can be a real pain because=20
you have to test on (or emulate) a box without the requisite libraries,=20
etc.
What's the chance of getting cpan testers to check those? Perhaps a=20
wxPerlBinary dist or some sort of change to Alien which allowed it to=20
install from source/par?
=2D-Eric
=2D-=20
The opinions expressed in this e-mail were randomly generated by
the computer and do not necessarily reflect the views of its owner.
=2D-Management
=2D--------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
=2D--------------------------------------------------
|