From: Eric W. <scr...@gm...> - 2007-04-28 22:12:40
|
# from Mattia Barbon # on Saturday 28 April 2007 02:31 pm: >=A0 The trouble (as usual) is finding somebody to do it. =A0I remember it >took me a whole weekend (when everything went smoothly) to make a >wxPerl binary release for RedHat, Win32 and OS X Panther+Tiger. =A0I >also remember I anticipated with (almost) fear every wxPerl release, >and I am much more relaxed now that I decided not to provide binaries >myself. The dotReader binary releases haven't been any sort of walk in the park. =20 A build Module::Build subclass which bundles everything into a=20 build+push scheme has been very helpful. Perhaps if the wxPerl dist/svn included a build tool that could create=20 and upload (via svn/ftp?) a PAR for the given platform then volunteers=20 could handle the per-platform deps and QC? Maybe even nightly builds? Of course, getting that all setup and tested can be a real pain because=20 you have to test on (or emulate) a box without the requisite libraries,=20 etc. What's the chance of getting cpan testers to check those? Perhaps a=20 wxPerlBinary dist or some sort of change to Alien which allowed it to=20 install from source/par? =2D-Eric =2D-=20 The opinions expressed in this e-mail were randomly generated by the computer and do not necessarily reflect the views of its owner. =2D-Management =2D-------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com =2D-------------------------------------------------- |