Re: [wxperl-users] wxPerl-Constructors

[Eric W. <scr...@gm...>]

# from Mattia Barbon
# on Sunday 01 April 2007 08:23 am:

>=A0 I'm just curious as to why you made
>
>=A0 my $ctrl =3D wxPerl::Foo->new(undef);
>=A0 my $ctrl =3D wxPerl::Foo->new();
>
>equivalent, given that the only windows for which an undef parent
>makes sense (Wx::Frame and Wx::Dialog) have additional mandatory
>arguments.

Oops, that's right.  Those both require a title, so that doesn't make=20
much sense.  I suppose I should make wxPerl::Foo->new() be equivalent=20
to Wx::Foo->new() then?

Thanks,
Eric
=2D-=20
"You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit."
=2D-Ginsberg's Restatement of the Three Laws of Thermodynamics
=2D--------------------------------------------------
    http://scratchcomputing.com
=2D--------------------------------------------------