From: Mattia B. \<mattia\.barbon\@libero\.it\> <mat...@li...> - 2007-03-07 07:54:57
|
> Dan Freed wrote: > While I am not a detractor of new projects, I think a project such as = > this should be an different beast than wxPerl. It should be a > compatibility layer of sorts for wxPerl and Perk/tk. I completely agree (that's why I proposed something like Wx::Perl::Tk for this). > On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Bob Hunter wrote: > > > Mattia, your message is already an important step > > forward. At least you acknowledge that wxPerl can be > > improved from that point of view, and are open to > > change/improvement. Given that time is limited for > > everyone, the best approach to proceed is to post a > > general "call for contributions", and leverage from > > the open source community. Design ideas are valuable > > as much as, if not more than, specific code, because > > they can save a lot of coding. I believe you are a bit over-optimistic: I expect there will be a loto of people wanting to _use_ this compatibility layer, but not many (IOW, none...) that want to actually code it. I don't know if I am being cynical or have just been an OSS developer for too much time... Best regards, Mattia =0A=0A=0A------------------------------------------------------=0ALeggi G= RATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-mode=99 di Wind=0Ahttp://i-mode.win= d.it=0A |