From: Mattia B. \<mattia\.barbon\@libero\.it\> <mat...@li...> - 2007-03-06 09:38:36
|
> I understand that wxWidgets is a very complex > meta-library for local graphic libraries, but why > would anyone be bothered with so many details? tkPerl OTOH, why would someone (me!) already knowing wxWidgets, bother to write _and_ docuemnt a different interface. For users? Good point, but I when? > could be just as cumbersone as wxPerl, but is not. I > still think that a perl interface to wxWidgets, wxPerl > that is, could be more perlish, easier that is. The I agree. The answer is not necessarily a Tk-ish interface (which would be nevertheless good for compatibility). > cheaper, and human time is (we hope) getting more > valuable. The person has to come first." [Larry Wall] ...and mine is limited... if anybody feels like writing Wx::Perl::Tk (or whatever), please feel free to do so. Regards Mattia =0A=0A=0A------------------------------------------------------=0ACon Pro= meteo prestiti senza spese fino a 31.000 Euro!=0Ahttp://click.libero.it/w= ebnation06marz07=0A |