From: Ed W <li...@wi...> - 2006-06-28 09:07:48
|
Eriam Schaffter wrote: > Le Mer 28 juin 2006 1:20, Donovan Allen a =E9crit : > =20 >> (in a thread >> perhaps?) >> =20 > > > May I suggest POE ? > > I think that would be a perfect fit for this situation ! > > You can have a look at POE::Loop::Wx > =20 POE is a great suggestion and I have played with it a little already. =20 Actually my first instinct was NOT to use POE on the client end of this=20 system (mainly win32) because on the surface it looked as though POE=20 might be quite slow? The application also acts as a network proxy for some other network=20 stuff and it would be useful to have it all in one exe process. Anyone=20 got any real world statistics on whether POE is slow and heavy, or=20 decently speedy in the real world? Thanks for all the suggestions so far. For sure the double viewport=20 suggestion is what I was heading towards, but the implementation wasn't=20 so clear in my mind until you paraphrased the algorithm so neatly. Thank= s Ed W |