From: Miguel V. <jmv...@di...> - 2008-03-26 12:21:58
|
Hi all, I installed GHC 6.8.2 and wxHaskell 0.10.3 (final release, not RC X) in a Windows XP, and everything installed ok. Tested the samples: ghc -package wx Helloword.hs -o Helloword.exe But when I run Helloword.exe, only an error message appears with: "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK to terminate the application." Is someone else having problems in Windows XP? When I tested in a Windows Vista, wxHaskell 0.10.3 really said "Hello World"!! :-) best regards Miguel Vilaça |
From: Eric K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-26 13:47:16
|
Hi, On 26/03/2008, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > I installed GHC 6.8.2 and wxHaskell 0.10.3 (final release, not RC X) > in a Windows XP, and everything installed ok. > > Tested the samples: ghc -package wx Helloword.hs -o Helloword.exe > > But when I run Helloword.exe, only an error message appears with: > > "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK > to terminate the application." Thanks for the report! Shelarcy, did you use Vista to build this? Does this mean we need a separate package for XP? I could conceivably do this, but it would be a bit of a pain, as I haven't really set up my Windows virtual machine. So if you have an XP box that you're willing to build on, I'd be interested! [of course, if it turns out that other people with XP can run Helloworld, that's a different story] Miguel, would you be willing to try building from source? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |
From: shelarcy <she...@gm...> - 2008-03-26 14:37:21
|
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:47:07 +0900, Eric Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks for the report! Shelarcy, did you use Vista to build this? I'm using Windows XP now. But I installed Visual Studio in my Windows. So, my environment is different from normal users. > Does this mean we need a separate package for XP? I don't know what is a problem of this. So, I can't answer for that now, Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ |
From: José M. V. <jmv...@di...> - 2008-03-26 23:04:20
|
Hi Eric, Thanks for the fast answer. The machine in which I'm running XP is an old one and it take some time to compile. Since I'm not with much time during this week, I'll take a try during the weekend. Best Miguel Vilaça -----Mensagem original----- De: wxh...@li... [mailto:wxh...@li...] Em nome de Eric Kow Enviada: quarta-feira, 26 de Março de 2008 13:47 Para: Miguel Vilaça Cc: wxh...@li... Assunto: Re: [wxhaskell-users] wxHaskell 0.10.3: problems in Windows XP Hi, On 26/03/2008, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > I installed GHC 6.8.2 and wxHaskell 0.10.3 (final release, not RC X) > in a Windows XP, and everything installed ok. > > Tested the samples: ghc -package wx Helloword.hs -o Helloword.exe > > But when I run Helloword.exe, only an error message appears with: > > "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK > to terminate the application." Thanks for the report! Shelarcy, did you use Vista to build this? Does this mean we need a separate package for XP? I could conceivably do this, but it would be a bit of a pain, as I haven't really set up my Windows virtual machine. So if you have an XP box that you're willing to build on, I'd be interested! [of course, if it turns out that other people with XP can run Helloworld, that's a different story] Miguel, would you be willing to try building from source? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxh...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users |
From: Andrew B. <And...@cs...> - 2008-03-27 11:13:03
|
Eric Kow wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/03/2008, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > >> I installed GHC 6.8.2 and wxHaskell 0.10.3 (final release, not RC X) >> in a Windows XP, and everything installed ok. >> >> Tested the samples: ghc -package wx Helloword.hs -o Helloword.exe >> >> But when I run Helloword.exe, only an error message appears with: >> >> "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK >> to terminate the application." >> > > I installed the same on Windows XP - this all works fine ! (XP Professional 2002 SP 2) My big complicated program (developed under GHC6.4/wx0.9) also worked without problems. But I have seen that error message popping up recently, from other applications.... (Mozilla?) |
From: shelarcy <she...@gm...> - 2008-03-26 14:20:22
|
Hi Miguel, On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:21:47 +0900, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK > to terminate the application." I searched this error using goole, then I found similar problem form websites and forums. Some of them advice to install Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package. http://www.issociate.de/board/post/474708/Xampp_Apache_Install_Problem.html How about install that? You can get that from below page. http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13-9c99-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ |
From: José M. V. <jmv...@di...> - 2008-03-26 22:56:00
|
Hi Shelarcy, Thanks for your quick help. I successfully installed Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package on Windows XP but the same error remains. I even rebooted (for some reason this usually solve many problems) the machine but no luck either. I'll take more time around this during the weekend, to see if I discover the reason for this error. In the meanwhile, I would appreciate any report of a successful installation of wxHaskell binary on Windows XP (without the development stuff). Anyone? Just to check if this is a specific error (of this machine) or a global one. Best Miguel Vilaça -----Mensagem original----- De: wxh...@li... [mailto:wxh...@li...] Em nome de shelarcy Enviada: quarta-feira, 26 de Março de 2008 14:20 Para: Miguel Vilaça Cc: wxhaskell-users Assunto: Re: [wxhaskell-users] wxHaskell 0.10.3: problems in Windows XP Hi Miguel, On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:21:47 +0900, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK > to terminate the application." I searched this error using goole, then I found similar problem form websites and forums. Some of them advice to install Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package. http://www.issociate.de/board/post/474708/Xampp_Apache_Install_Problem.html How about install that? You can get that from below page. http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13- 9c99-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxh...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users |
From: Miguel V. <jmv...@di...> - 2008-03-29 13:41:26
|
Hi again, After several unsuccesseful tries, and some googling, I found out many complains of people seeing the message "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK to terminate the application." when they run their executables out of the devellopment machine. The error also seems to be often related with: * DXUT - related with images and DirectX SDK - (see http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1048802&SiteID=1) * MS Office (see http://support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?mode=r&catalog=LCID%3d1033&1033comm=1&spid=global&query=0xc0150002 ) Some pratical, to find a solutions is pointed in http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/VC/microsoft.public.vc.mfc/2006-09/msg02020.html: "To see dependent DLLs, open your application with the dependency viewer (depends.exe)." Can you please take a look on this and see if everything needed is going into the DLL? In the meanwhile, I also found that the 0.10.3 binaries loose the opengl support compared with 0.9.4 as pointed in http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html. Is there some reason for this? In my specific case that will also be a problem. But the 0xc0150002 is not related to this since the simple (and not opengl related) HelloWorld.exe continues failling in my machine. Since I found one machine that runs the code and one that doesn't, I comparing the software installed on them. Maybe I found a solution this way!! best Miguel Vilaça Quoting José Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...>: > Hi Shelarcy, > > Thanks for your quick help. > > I successfully installed Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package on Windows > XP but the same error remains. I even rebooted (for some reason this usually > solve many problems) the machine but no luck either. > > I'll take more time around this during the weekend, to see if I discover the > reason for this error. > > In the meanwhile, I would appreciate any report of a successful installation > of wxHaskell binary on Windows XP (without the development stuff). Anyone? > Just to check if this is a specific error (of this machine) or a global one. > > Best > Miguel Vilaça > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: wxh...@li... > [mailto:wxh...@li...] Em nome de shelarcy > Enviada: quarta-feira, 26 de Março de 2008 14:20 > Para: Miguel Vilaça > Cc: wxhaskell-users > Assunto: Re: [wxhaskell-users] wxHaskell 0.10.3: problems in Windows XP > > Hi Miguel, > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:21:47 +0900, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> > wrote: >> "The applicattion failed to initialize properly (0xc0150002). Click OK >> to terminate the application." > > I searched this error using goole, then I found similar problem form > websites > and forums. Some of them advice to install Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable > Package. > > http://www.issociate.de/board/post/474708/Xampp_Apache_Install_Problem.html > > How about install that? > You can get that from below page. > > http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=32bc1bee-a3f9-4c13- > 9c99-220b62a191ee&displaylang=en > > Best Regards, > > -- > shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> > http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-users mailing list > wxh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-users mailing list > wxh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users > |
From: shelarcy <she...@gm...> - 2008-03-29 15:11:12
|
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:41:19 +0900, Miguel Vilaça <jmv...@di...> wrote: > Some pratical, to find a solutions is pointed in > http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/VC/microsoft.public.vc.mfc/2006-09/msg02020.html: > "To see dependent DLLs, open your application with the dependency > viewer (depends.exe)." > > Can you please take a look on this and see if everything needed is > going into the DLL? Dependency Walker is free. So, I think you can look that yourself. http://www.dependencywalker.com/ Anyway I saw that. > Error: At least one required implicit or forwarded dependency was not found. > Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found. > Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in a delay-load dependent module. This error come from MSVCR80.DLL. And I found SP1's DLL is different from non-SP one today that I told you in previous mail. So, please test SP1's DLL. > In the meanwhile, I also found that the 0.10.3 binaries loose the > opengl support compared with 0.9.4 as pointed in > http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html. > Is there some reason for this? I always enable opengl support to release Windows binary. (Because previous version (include 0.9.4) is built by that policy.) I think this difference is come from ghc's behavior change. Please use -package OpenGL or --make to build executable files. Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ |
From: Eric Y. K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-29 13:56:43
|
Hi, Answering the one question I know an answer to. > In the meanwhile, I also found that the 0.10.3 binaries loose the > opengl support compared with 0.9.4 as pointed in > http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html. > Is there some reason for this? There used to be a flag bug in wxWidgets/wxHaskell, where (1) wxWidgets/wxHaskell would include opengl support even if you did not ask for it and (2) you still needed to pass --with-opengl in order for the appropriate right set of linker flags to be used when building applications. Otherwise, people got strange GL-related errors when compiling their apps, even if they weren't using OpenGL in any way. We have now fixed that error so that you can now compile it without that flag and still link your applications succesfully. That said, we have not established a policy on what extra batteries should be included with the default binaries. I guess a good thing to aim for is the most extras we can get that also come with a vanilla wxWidgets on all platforms. If you're willing to do research on that, we can go re-think what flags to use. I'm guessing that since prior versions of wxHaskell had opengl support, this kind of thing is OK. I'm personally hoping that a future wxhaskell will allow to install extras separately (e.g., that you could download just a binary for opengl support), but we haven't really worked out the right way to do this right. So what does this mean for you? Well, if you're willing to do so, you could recompile it yourself with flags. Otherwise, we could think about making yet another release (0.10.3-1) with opengl and some minor fixes in the makefile/configure script. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |
From: Conal E. <co...@co...> - 2008-03-29 19:41:33
|
As long as there's a single binary (per release per platform) I'm for opengl being part of it. On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Eric Y. Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Answering the one question I know an answer to. > > > In the meanwhile, I also found that the 0.10.3 binaries loose the > > opengl support compared with 0.9.4 as pointed in > > http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html. > > Is there some reason for this? > > There used to be a flag bug in wxWidgets/wxHaskell, where (1) > wxWidgets/wxHaskell would include opengl support even if you did not > ask for it and (2) you still needed to pass --with-opengl in order > for the appropriate right set of linker flags to be used when building > applications. Otherwise, people got strange GL-related errors when > compiling their apps, even if they weren't using OpenGL in any way. > > We have now fixed that error so that you can now compile it without that > flag and still link your applications succesfully. > > That said, we have not established a policy on what extra batteries > should be included with the default binaries. I guess a good thing to > aim for is the most extras we can get that also come with a vanilla > wxWidgets on all platforms. If you're willing to do research on that, > we can go re-think what flags to use. I'm guessing that since prior > versions of wxHaskell had opengl support, this kind of thing is OK. > > I'm personally hoping that a future wxhaskell will allow to install > extras separately (e.g., that you could download just a binary for > opengl support), but we haven't really worked out the right way to > do this right. > > So what does this mean for you? Well, if you're willing to do so, you > could recompile it yourself with flags. Otherwise, we could think about > making yet another release (0.10.3-1) with opengl and some minor fixes > in the makefile/configure script. > > -- > Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> > PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-users mailing list > wxh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users > > |
From: Miguel V. <jmv...@di...> - 2008-03-31 11:32:16
|
Hi, I start this when i read in http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html that concerning binaries for version 0.10.3: "All packages have ODBC support (but not OpenGL)." But at least the windows binary (as stated by shelarcy) and the wxhaskell-bin-powerpc-mac2.6.4-ghc6.8.2-0.10.3-0.dmg have opengl enabled. I tested those two packages my self with code using opengl. So, is just that the information at the webpage is more restricted than the packages :-) best Miguel Vilaça Quoting Conal Elliott <co...@co...>: > As long as there's a single binary (per release per platform) I'm for opengl > being part of it. > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Eric Y. Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Answering the one question I know an answer to. >> >> > In the meanwhile, I also found that the 0.10.3 binaries loose the >> > opengl support compared with 0.9.4 as pointed in >> > http://wxhaskell.sourceforge.net/download.html. >> > Is there some reason for this? >> >> There used to be a flag bug in wxWidgets/wxHaskell, where (1) >> wxWidgets/wxHaskell would include opengl support even if you did not >> ask for it and (2) you still needed to pass --with-opengl in order >> for the appropriate right set of linker flags to be used when building >> applications. Otherwise, people got strange GL-related errors when >> compiling their apps, even if they weren't using OpenGL in any way. >> >> We have now fixed that error so that you can now compile it without that >> flag and still link your applications succesfully. >> >> That said, we have not established a policy on what extra batteries >> should be included with the default binaries. I guess a good thing to >> aim for is the most extras we can get that also come with a vanilla >> wxWidgets on all platforms. If you're willing to do research on that, >> we can go re-think what flags to use. I'm guessing that since prior >> versions of wxHaskell had opengl support, this kind of thing is OK. >> >> I'm personally hoping that a future wxhaskell will allow to install >> extras separately (e.g., that you could download just a binary for >> opengl support), but we haven't really worked out the right way to >> do this right. >> >> So what does this mean for you? Well, if you're willing to do so, you >> could recompile it yourself with flags. Otherwise, we could think about >> making yet another release (0.10.3-1) with opengl and some minor fixes >> in the makefile/configure script. >> >> -- >> Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> >> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >> _______________________________________________ >> wxhaskell-users mailing list >> wxh...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users >> >> > |
From: Andrew B. <And...@cs...> - 2008-03-28 16:59:56
|
Andrew Butterfield wrote: > > I installed the same on Windows XP - this all works fine ! > > (XP Professional 2002 SP 2) > > My big complicated program (developed under GHC6.4/wx0.9) also > worked without problems. > I should have checked out a bit more - what has happened is that all my scollbars have disappeared ! Any idea why this might have happened ? > |
From: Eric K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-28 17:06:31
|
> I should have checked out a bit more - what has happened is that all my > scollbars have disappeared ! > Any idea why this might have happened ? No, but if you think there may be a bug, we'd love to hear about it on http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=73133&atid=536845 preferably with a test case (see our bugs/ directory for examples) Test cases may also be submitted via darcs send to speed things up a bit. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |