From: Jeffrey A. S. <je...@ma...> - 2003-11-12 19:47:38
|
Greetings wxHaskell users, Here are some problems I have with the wxhaskell-0.4 binary release for Mac OS X. 1. The installer fails. This seems to be due to some erroneous file names in the post-install (and post-upgrade) scripts. 2. If I do the post-install step manually (i.e., add the wx packages to ghc's package database), there is an error at link time. The linker claims to be looking for a file that doesn't even exist in the wxhaskell-0.4 installation. However, the file *did* exist under wxhaskell-0.3. (I wiped my wxhaskell-0.3 installation completely before running the 0.4 installer.) I've submitted two bug reports with more details on these problems. Let me know if I should repeat the details on this mailing list. wxHaskell is very cool. That's why I want to get it working on my Mac! (I'd also love to see a binary rpm of 0.4 for Linux, by the way.) Regards, Jeff Scofield (PhD) Seattle |
From: Daan L. <daa...@xs...> - 2003-11-13 12:00:19
|
Hi Jeff, This problem was fixed last Monday, so I guess that you have either an older binary installer -- or getting an older one from a mirror. Just try to get a version from a big mirror. Let me know if that works for you, All the best, Daan. On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:47:39 -0800, Jeffrey A. Scofield <je...@ma...> wrote: > Greetings wxHaskell users, > > Here are some problems I have with the wxhaskell-0.4 binary release for > Mac OS X. > > 1. The installer fails. This seems to be due to some erroneous file > names in the post-install (and post-upgrade) scripts. > > 2. If I do the post-install step manually (i.e., add the wx packages to > ghc's package database), there is an error at link time. The linker > claims to be looking for a file that doesn't even exist in the > wxhaskell-0.4 installation. However, the file *did* exist under > wxhaskell-0.3. (I wiped my wxhaskell-0.3 installation completely > before running the 0.4 installer.) > > I've submitted two bug reports with more details on these problems. > Let me know if I should repeat the details on this mailing list. > > wxHaskell is very cool. That's why I want to get it working on my Mac! > (I'd also love to see a binary rpm of 0.4 for Linux, by the way.) > > Regards, > Jeff Scofield (PhD) > Seattle > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, > 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest > developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, > WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-users mailing list > wxh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users > |
From: Daan L. <daa...@xs...> - 2003-11-13 12:16:00
|
Hi Jeff, This problem was fixed last Monday, so I guess that you have either an older binary installer -- or getting an older one from a mirror. Just try to get a version from a big mirror. Let me know if that works for you, All the best, Daan. On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:47:39 -0800, Jeffrey A. Scofield <je...@ma...> wrote:On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:00:15 +0100, Daan Leijen <daa...@xs...> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > This problem was fixed last Monday, so I guess that you have > either an older binary installer -- or getting an older one > from a mirror. Just try to get a version from a big mirror. > > Let me know if that works for you, > All the best, > Daan. > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:47:39 -0800, Jeffrey A. Scofield <je...@ma...> wrote: > >> Greetings wxHaskell users, >> >> Here are some problems I have with the wxhaskell-0.4 binary release for >> Mac OS X. >> >> 1. The installer fails. This seems to be due to some erroneous file >> names in the post-install (and post-upgrade) scripts. >> >> 2. If I do the post-install step manually (i.e., add the wx packages to >> ghc's package database), there is an error at link time. The linker >> claims to be looking for a file that doesn't even exist in the >> wxhaskell-0.4 installation. However, the file *did* exist under >> wxhaskell-0.3. (I wiped my wxhaskell-0.3 installation completely >> before running the 0.4 installer.) >> >> I've submitted two bug reports with more details on these problems. >> Let me know if I should repeat the details on this mailing list. >> >> wxHaskell is very cool. That's why I want to get it working on my Mac! >> (I'd also love to see a binary rpm of 0.4 for Linux, by the way.) >> >> Regards, >> Jeff Scofield (PhD) >> Seattle >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, >> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest >> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, >> WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> wxhaskell-users mailing list >> wxh...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users >> > |
From: Jeffrey S. <je...@ma...> - 2003-11-14 05:51:48
|
Daan: > This problem was fixed last Monday, so I guess that you have > either an older binary installer -- or getting an older one > from a mirror. Just try to get a version from a big mirror. Yes, I downloaded a new version and everything works really well now. It solves my resizing problems also. I just have to call refit. Thanks very much! Regards, Jeff Scofield Seattle |