From: Eric K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 13:51:41
|
Hi Shelarcy (and others), Some results from Neil's testing of the wxhaskell 0.10.3rc1 on Windows. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Neil Mitchell <nd...@cs...> Date: 7 Mar 2008 13:47 Subject: Re: wxhaskell 0.10.3rc1 - testers wanted To: Eric Kow <eri...@gm...> Hi Eric, Looks like it works fine. A readme would be useful to tell people to go run wxregister.bat. Ideally an installer that did it all for you, but the readme is a nice quick solution. I tried the bouncing ball demo, and it disabled the close button, plus there are no visible instructions on how to create more windows or bouncing balls - not very friendly. I figured out that Alt+F4 works (even though the button suggests it won't), but hardly intuative. The camels program also goes two levels back, rather than restarting the current level. It works, and seems perfectly stable and native looking - so in good shape for a quick release! Thanks Neil On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Eric Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > I am writing because of the advice you had given us (wxhaskell) to > focus on getting a Windows release out ASAP. > > Well... better late than never, I suppose. > > Could I interest you in testing out our first release candidate? > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=73133&package_id=73173&release_id=582361 > > The new features are Unicode support, partial Cabalisation, profiling > and split-objs. > > -- > Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> > PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 > -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |
From: shelarcy <she...@gm...> - 2008-03-08 08:10:18
|
Hi, On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:51:35 +0900, Eric Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote: > Looks like it works fine. A readme would be useful to tell people to > go run wxregister.bat. Ideally an installer that did it all for you, > but the readme is a nice quick solution. I want to know what is a good for readme.txt description. I think we must write not only for Windows but also other platforms. And we must avoid lengthy instruction same as wxHaskell page and wiki. And Ideas? Thanks, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ |
From: Eric Y. K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-08 11:06:27
|
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 17:10:00 +0900, shelarcy wrote: > I want to know what is a good for readme.txt description. > I think we must write not only for Windows but also other platforms. > And we must avoid lengthy instruction same as wxHaskell page and wiki. I agree. The readme should probably just tell you the minimum you need to install wxhaskell using the packages. On Windows, it should probably just say which batch files to run. On Mac, it's pretty self-explanatory (just double-click the .pkg file). Not sure about Linux; probably just tell the user to copy the lib files? Other than that, we probably want to link to the homepage and the wiki and suggest the user compile the sample applications to make sure everything is working -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |
From: Mads L. <mad...@ya...> - 2008-03-08 11:43:42
|
Eric Y. Kow: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 17:10:00 +0900, shelarcy wrote: > > I want to know what is a good for readme.txt description. > > I think we must write not only for Windows but also other platforms. > > And we must avoid lengthy instruction same as wxHaskell page and wiki. > > I agree. > > The readme should probably just tell you the minimum you need to install > wxhaskell using the packages. On Windows, it should probably just say > which batch files to run. On Mac, it's pretty self-explanatory (just > double-click the .pkg file). Not sure about Linux; probably just tell > the user to copy the lib files? I was thinking about making a .deb package file Debian (could also be used for Debian derivatives like Ubuntu). You would then just do > dpkg -i WxHaskell.deb It should install to /usr/local, to minimize the risk of hurting the users system. And it will be easier for the user to remove WxHaskell if something goes horribly wrong. I do not really know how to make .deb files, but from my initial readings it do not seem to complicated. Note, that it will not be the kind of .deb than can go into the main Debian repository, as they need to follow an endless number of rules. Just something the user can download and easily install/remove. Greetings, Mads Lindstrøm > > Other than that, we probably want to link to the homepage and the wiki > and suggest the user compile the sample applications to make sure > everything is working > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxh...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel |
From: Eric Y. K. <eri...@gm...> - 2008-03-08 11:51:44
|
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:40:07 +0100, Mads Lindstrøm wrote: > I was thinking about making a .deb package file Debian (could also be > used for Debian derivatives like Ubuntu). You would then just do > > > dpkg -i WxHaskell.deb Yes, please! The job should be made easier with http://haskell-unsafe.alioth.debian.org/archive/i386/unstable/w/wxhaskell/ There is already an rpmdist target in the makefile. Having a debdist target would be nice. Also, the darcs darcs repository (as in the source code to darcs) has some debian-related stuff in the makefile and in its release/ subdirectory. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 |
From: Mads L. <mad...@ya...> - 2008-03-08 20:57:16
|
Eric Y. Kow: Thank you for the pointers. They helped a lot. Greetings, Mads > On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:40:07 +0100, Mads Lindstrøm wrote: > > I was thinking about making a .deb package file Debian (could also be > > used for Debian derivatives like Ubuntu). You would then just do > > > > > dpkg -i WxHaskell.deb > > Yes, please! > > The job should be made easier with > http://haskell-unsafe.alioth.debian.org/archive/i386/unstable/w/wxhaskell/ > > There is already an rpmdist target in the makefile. Having a debdist > target would be nice. > > Also, the darcs darcs repository (as in the source code to darcs) has > some debian-related stuff in the makefile and in its release/ > subdirectory. > |