Re: [wxhaskell-users] FW: Reviving wxHaskell

[shelarcy <she...@ca...>]

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 06:03:46 +0900, Eric Y. Kow <eri...@gm...> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 13:03:52 -0700, Daan Leijen wrote:
>> One potential challenge is to find a group of testers that are
>> willing to help compiling wxHaskell on different target systems:
>> Windows, MacOS X, and Unix/GTK variations.
>
> I volunteer to help test on MacOS X

I voluteer to help test on Windows, too.


> Why don't we make the switch to darcs while we're at it?  Revision
> control may be the least of our worries, but I think that darcs would
> have been helpful specifically for our case  (multiple
> revisions of my Unicode patch, Shelarcy's patches for Windows stuff,
> Mac Makefile stuff, the new DB-related issues).
>
> Keeping track of patch-on-patch-on-patch has gottten to be tricky.
> Having a truly patch-oriented system would
> 1. make it easier for outsiders to submit modifications
> 2. make us more resistant to the busy-ness of our project leaders
>
> So, should we go ahead and do this?


I agree with you.


-- 
shelarcy <shelarcy    capella.freemail.ne.jp>
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/