Re: [wxhaskell-users] slider value limit

[Patrick S. <mai...@st...>]

Hmm, I think you should think about it again. Let us assume you have a slider 
having the same width like your screen. The smallest step you are able to do 
is exactly one pixel on the screen. To reach every single value of a int 
slider that is over your screen you have to have a screen size of 32767 
pixels...

You should use a int slider and calculate your float values. With a slider of 
100 pixels you will never have more than 100 discrete steps. Even when you 
would have a real-valued slider you would only be able to reach a few 
points..

What are you trying to do?

Cheers
Patrick 


On Tuesday 10 May 2005 04:56, Conal Elliott wrote:
> There seems to be a value limit of 32767 for sliders.  Does anyone know
> a work-around?
>
> I'm really after a real-valued slider, which I was approximating with an
> int slider with inflated values.  Does anyone have a real-valued slider?
>
>             - Conal