From: Matthew W. <ma...@al...> - 2004-03-03 15:11:09
|
Daan Leijen wrote: > I can't guarantee it as I haven't tested myself on gentoo, but I believe > that wxhaskell has > no compile-time encoded paths in its generated libraries. During linking > I use "--soname" > to remove the directory part -- relying on the linker to find it (using > LD_LIBRARY_PATH for > example, or by putting it in the same directory as the executable, or ...) I'm not very big on the mysteries of linking and shared libraries and other such magic. I guess we could just try it and see :-) >> A common solution is an install target allowing specification of a >> target directory to be used instead > > > Good idea, maybe I'll make that an extra option if that proves useful > for gentoo unix. > Andres Loh is using Gentoo and he works just across my office so it > would be relatively > painless to do some testing :-) :-) >> I may be wrong, but I believe the GNU autotools make this kind of >> thing quite easy to do these days. > > > I guess that is right, but the autotools gave me too much trouble to > work across platforms (unix,win98,winXP,macOSX) and I dropped back to > hand-written config/make -- and now that it is done, there is not much > incentive anymore to do otherwise :-) Indeed. I personally dislike the autotools intensely, but sometimes they're the best available option. Clearly I think that indicates we need a new option. Thanks. Sorry if I'm coming over a bit abrupt, I'm writing these e-mails during compiles at work. |