From: Gour <go...@ma...> - 2004-03-03 14:04:56
|
Daan Leijen (daa...@xs...) wrote: > The documentation is generated from the source, so there is no need to > include it. > Furthermore, the binary releases include documentation nowadays. The doc > package > is just provided for those that don't have haddock or don't want to build > the > documentation themselves. Oops..excuse me. And, yes, I was thinking only about source package (not binary) release. > >I was playing during the 0.30.4 but could not solve sandbox problem since > >wxhaskell writes into /usr/lib. > > This is easily solved by giving the "--prefix" option to configure. See > the "building" page on the wxHaskell website. (wxhaskell normally installs > whereever you install wxWidgets). The point is that Gentoo has a concept of "safe sandbox" i.e. building process is done in temporary directory and if successful, it installs (emerges) into real directory. wxhaskell installs in /usr/bin (by default), so I had to add an option to allow wxhaskell ebuild to write directly into /usr/lib which is not safe in case something goes wrong since files in /usr/lib can be overwritten. I tried by patching configure & config/config.mk scripts to overcome LIBDIR entry. Now I am trying to build ghc-6.2 from source and/or waiting for official 6.2.1 since 6.2 is not usable. Then I'm going to resume Gentoo ebuild. > ps. Let's take this discussion to "wxhaskell-users". Yes. It was by mistaken cross-post. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour go...@ma... Registered Linux User #278493 |