From: Daan L. <daa...@xs...> - 2003-08-23 17:28:44
|
hi Jose, > Hi. I have noticed some methods, like windowGetAdjustedBestSize, > windowSetPosition, etc., have not been implemented (they might be in > wxcClasses.hs). Some are redundant, like windowSetPosition, > so there is no matter about them. But some like windowGetAdjustedBestSize > can not be simulated with other methods (because it needs to keep track of > manually setted sizes). You are right. Not everything has been implemented. On the other hand, it is easy to add a method yourself: add a wrapper to "wxc/extra.cpp" and add the type signature to "wxc.h". I'll add this one to upcoming 0.2 release. (planned for the end of september). If you come across more of these issues, please let me know so that I can either add them, or apply your patches (or make you a developer so you can commit them yourself). All the best, Daan. > > Actually, it seems not a wxhaskell bug, since the C sources > from the ELJ > project do not provide these methods (I have checked it, and i.e. > wxWindow_GetAdjustedBestSize does not appear). But I got > confused when I read > at wxEiffel site that they have got the wrap for wxWindow class fully > implemented. This can not be true: where is the > wxWindow::GetAdjustedBestSize > method? > > Regards, > > Jose > David. > > --------------------------------------------- > Este mensaje lo ha enviado un Alumno de la Universidad de Malaga. > http://www.alumnos.uma.es/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a > single machine. > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines > at the same time. Free trial click > here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-users mailing list > wxh...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users > > |