From: Luc T. <luc...@gm...> - 2013-05-31 13:28:26
|
btw, we are already at the solution stage, what is the problem in fact ? what are the typical difficulties that a raise when installing wx ? is it on the C side or on the haskell side ? is it because they have to be fetched separately ? do we have a shared view on where lies the problems ? -- Luc Taesch Envoyé avec Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Le vendredi 31 mai 2013 à 15:24, Eric Kow a écrit : > On 31 May 2013 06:34, harry <vol...@ho... (mailto:vol...@ho...)> wrote: > > The first problem is that wxdirect installs both executables and a library - > > why is that necessary, and is there another way to do it? > > > > > Could you elaborate on this? I'm not 100% sure I follow. > > Is the issue something related to the wxdirect executable not being > available in the sandbox environment? > > One issue is that wxdirect is used in the build process of the wxcore Setup.hs > > One thing which I think might help matters is if we had a way for the > custom Setup.hs in wxcore to depend on wxdirect. Now one option would > be for us to just swallow wxdirect directly into wxcore, making it > part of the setup script. There's no particular reason it has to be > run as an executable. > > If not feasible, then we may need something like > https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/948 > > -- > Eric Kow <http://erickow.com> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-devel mailing list > wxh...@li... (mailto:wxh...@li...) > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel > > |