From: Henry L. <hen...@nt...> - 2012-06-27 17:02:45
|
Hi Eric Yes I have been essentially following that as a rational approach (though I guess you mean wxWidgets, wxcore, wx ) and I have used all your samples (thanks!). It's good to have a potted example to check out each level. I realise your readme instructions are skeletal but maybe worth adding that wxWidgets 'minimal' needs the "samples.xpm" file in the src dir (or equiv.). (An alternative wxWidgets version at http://wxwidgets.org/docs/tutorials/hworld.txt does not need this.) On macos another gratifying basic test is applying macosx-app and launching from finder (or open). Regards/ Henry On 27 Jun 2012, at 16:59, Eric Kow wrote: > Out of interest (sorry, not following thread), has the 3-step testing approach (wxc, wxcore, wx) in my minimal tester been useful at all? > > Thanks, > > Eric > > On 27 Jun 2012, at 16:46, Henry Lockyer wrote: > >> ok + thanks. I guess I'll wait for updated cabal if it is imminent . >> Re (1) I could double-check this in the meantime perhaps, but what to look for exactly? >> (I relied on "cabal install wx cabal-macosx" on an empty local user pkg lib to get it right.) > > -- > Eric Kow <http://erickow.com> > |