Re: [wxhaskell-users] [Announce] wxHaskell 0.90

[Jeremy O'D. <je...@o-...>]

I'll try and take a look at it this week. Currently I don't have a
convenient wxWidgets 2.8.x development environment, but I'll create one.

Jeremy

On 14/04/2012 22:40, "Henk-Jan van Tuyl" <hj...@ch...> wrote:

>
>L.S.,
>
>I had some problems installing the branch for wxWidgets 2.8.x:
>
>The command
>   cabal install 'wx < 0.90'
>results in
>   Resolving dependencies...
>   Downloading wxdirect-0.90...
>   :
>.
>
>The dependency on wxcore in wx.cabal (version 0.13.2.1) must have an
>upper  
>limit '< 0.90' and the dependency in wxdirect in wxcore.cabal (version
>0.13.2.1) must have an upper limit '< 0.90'
>
>Another bug:
>Cabal-install tried to install wxc-0.90; I saw the following error
>message:
>   setup.exe: This version of wxcore requires wx 2.9 to be available
>wx should be wxWidgets, of course.
>
>Regards,
>Henk-Jan van Tuyl
>
>
>-- 
>http://Van.Tuyl.eu/
>http://members.chello.nl/hjgtuyl/tourdemonad.html
>Haskell programming
>--