Re: [wxhaskell-devel] The future of wxC

[Eric K. <eri...@gm...>]

I was going to post on your blog, but you beat me to mentioning it. So better hear it from me, you should totally use GitHub for wxC. Plus it would be a chance to work with darcs-bridge maybe.
> Eric will probably kill me for saying this, but I think GitHub is probably the right place, possibly keeping Sourceforge as the project website and distribution point (I personally don't much like git, but it has mindshare, and probably makes more sense than Darcs for a non-Haskell project - plus my experience with patch-tag and darcsden has been that 'getting going' on a Windows machine is far from trivial). I could be persuaded to change my mind on this one, but probably only if one of the Darcs hosts can get the experience 'right' on Windows clients.
> Keep the Cabal-based build system to start with, until there is clear evidence of non-Haskell contributions.
> If wxC turns out to have legs, the main areas to attack should be:
> Move to bakefile based build.
> Automated generation of the binding.