Re: [wxhaskell-users] Some WX questions - a couple of missing bindings and a segfault

[shelarcy <she...@gm...>]

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:00:54 +0900, Jules Bean <ju...@je...> wrote:
>> "a seq b" doesn't guarantee that evaluate a before b.
>
> True, but that is not relevant here. It does guarantee that both get
> evaluated.

Okay, I see. I confused that.

>> return $! x
>> return $! image
>> return x
>
> that just uses seq.
>
> return $! x is just x `seq` return x
>
> that would add nothign to this code.

Ah ... it's my mistake. It just reduce x and image to WHNF.


Best Regards,

-- 
shelarcy <shelarcy    hotmail.co.jp>
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/