From: Malcolm N. <m.n...@wa...> - 2008-10-13 16:47:46
|
Tony Reina wrote: > > > For me personally I have no concerns what license the project > remains under or whether someone runs off and makes a fortune. I > have never had any pretensions to be Bill Gates and purely code > for my own enjoyment. If someone else makes money out of it well > good for them. > > I agree 100%. In my view, anyone can do anything they want with my > code so long as they don't interfere with my ability to do anything I > want with my code (Viva Liberte!). OK beaten into submission. > > > Therefore maybe you need a license that makes the source code > open, any changes need to come back to the developers, you can > compile the code for your own use, but any binaries created from > the source code cannot be redistributed for commercial gain, > except by the say so of the production team. Then would enable the > majority of end users to do what they want, use the product, fix > bugs and make changes, but keep the end product as ours. > > I don't know any existing license which does this. If we really want > something that will only allow us to make money, then we'd need to > come up with a custom license. That would mean we'd need a lawyer to > write it. Otherwise, I doubt it would hold up in court if it were > actually tested. > > So my vote is still with keeping the wxWindows licensing and handling > the creeps by shaming them publicly. If a creep sells our binaries for > $10,000, we can always sell them for $100 and drive him out of > business. ;>) > Then I'll side with the majority, so I assume that this means wxWidgets License. Mal |