From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-23 14:44:18
|
Hi Otto, I know that since some SF.net changes, wxCode submission form does not work well anymore... since I'm going to learn PHP for other reasons I'd like to help you with a site enhancement - something like what were said in the wx thread 'wxCode & wxWidgets' - that will make the site more look-pleasant and the content more accessible... is it okay ? Let me know, Francesco Montorsi |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-23 18:53:32
|
Hi Francesco, Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > Hi Otto, > I know that since some SF.net changes, wxCode submission form does > not work well anymore... since I'm going to learn PHP for other reasons > I'd like to help you with a site enhancement - something like what were > said in the wx thread 'wxCode & wxWidgets' - that will make the site > more look-pleasant and the content more accessible... > > is it okay ? > It's perfect if you look into a better design of the website but I've no time at the moment to help with anything. So just go ahead with what you have in mind and I'll look into it after the summer holiday. Please keep in mind that a component should be completely managable by the owner through CVS. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-23 19:48:29
|
Hi, > It's perfect if you look into a better design of the website but I've no > time at the moment to help with anything. ok, never mind; I think I could: 1) put some CSS & XHTML in the website to make it look better 2) re-code PHP stuff so that it does not use the SF email system (since new SF docs suggest to use cronjobs, which seems to be run not very often...) 3) maybe set up a simple wiki both for wxCode users and for wxCode developers... > So just go ahead with what you > have in mind and I'll look into it after the summer holiday. Please keep > in mind that a component should be completely managable by the owner > through CVS. sure, CVS is too much useful to forget it ;-) Just one thing: to perform the required changes, I'll need to write over some files of wxCode\htdocs folder which do not have the group write permission set... can you add it to all wxCode site files ? Thanks, Francesco |
From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2005-06-24 04:48:52
|
On 6/23/05, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > > It's perfect if you look into a better design of the website but I've n= o > > time at the moment to help with anything. > ok, never mind; > I think I could: > 1) put some CSS & XHTML in the website to make it look better ... > Just one thing: to perform the required changes, I'll need to write over > some files of wxCode\htdocs folder which do not have the group write > permission set... can you add it to all wxCode site files ? Francesco (I'm assuming you changed index.html/php), please see the readme.txt in the the root directory (add to it as as necessary). You have to get the CVS version of the website, edit files locally, commit, and then do a checkout at SF using the script wxCode-website or just run the parts of it that are necessary for your changes. ------------- Secondly, do we want to have doxygen docs in wxCode's CVS? They're pretty large and checking out wxCode is already pretty slow. I think that just providing a doxygen.cfg file for people to run may be enough since doxygen is easy to use. We could also make them available to people by putting them up on the website in htdocs/doxygen/projectname. That way people can refer to them online and if they really want a local copy either provide a zipped version (also stored in htdocs/doxygen/projectname) or like I said, just ask them to run doxygen themselves. Each individual maintainer would add these using ssh (probably using scp) as suits them. Thirdly, for screenshots, we could create htdocs/screenshots/projectname and users put their screenshots there. We could provide a sample template for people to use if they like, just so long as they have an index.html it'll work. All the developers for wxcode have ssh rights if I understand correctly, so they'll have to manage this aspect themselves. Again, I don't think it would be a good idea to put these in CVS since they're binary and when you download a component you'll have no need or want to have them. (Maybe this could be made easier with a wiki, but I don't know anything about that.) Just some thoughts, John Labenski |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-24 09:36:39
|
Hi, > Francesco (I'm assuming you changed index.html/php), please see the > readme.txt in the the root directory (add to it as as necessary). I could not found any readme in wxCode or wxCode\components or wxCode\website (CVS); do you refer to the readme.txt stored in /home/groups/w/wx/wxcode/htdocs ? I suggest to put that readme.txt in wxCode\website CVS... ;-) > You have to get the CVS version of the website, edit files locally, > commit, and then do a checkout at SF using the script wxCode-website > or just run the parts of it that are necessary for your changes. ok, perfect. > Secondly, do we want to have doxygen docs in wxCode's CVS? They're > pretty large and checking out wxCode is already pretty slow. sorry for that, I stored doxygen docs for some components in CVS... I'll remove them ASAP > I think > that just providing a doxygen.cfg file for people to run may be enough > since doxygen is easy to use. We could also make them available to > people by putting them up on the website in > htdocs/doxygen/projectname. > That way people can refer to them online > and if they really want a local copy either provide a zipped version > (also stored in htdocs/doxygen/projectname) or like I said, just ask > them to run doxygen themselves. Each individual maintainer would add > these using ssh (probably using scp) as suits them. I agree, this is a good solution. > Thirdly, for screenshots, we could create > htdocs/screenshots/projectname and users put their screenshots there. good idea; a special folder for the screenshots would make easier to put a link to them in the complist but I'm unsure about removing them from CVS... they could be very useful to people who just checkout the wxCode\components to choose if use/not use that component. But I understand that if all dev save their screenshots in CVS we'll end up with a very heavy CVS repository... > We could provide a sample template for people to use if they like, > just so long as they have an index.html it'll work. All the developers > for wxcode have ssh rights if I understand correctly, so they'll have > to manage this aspect themselves. Again, I don't think it would be a > good idea to put these in CVS since they're binary and when you > download a component you'll have no need or want to have them. (Maybe > this could be made easier with a wiki, but I don't know anything about > that.) Just give me some time to: 1) understand exactly how wxCode website works actually 2) do my PHP experiments ;-) so I'll be ready to discuss about these site changes better next week ;-) Francesco Montorsi PS: I won't make any modifications to wxCode website without first mailing it to wxcode-users |
From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2005-06-25 00:57:57
|
On 6/24/05, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > > Francesco (I'm assuming you changed index.html/php), please see the > > readme.txt in the the root directory (add to it as as necessary). > I could not found any readme in wxCode or wxCode\components or > wxCode\website (CVS); do you refer to the readme.txt stored in > /home/groups/w/wx/wxcode/htdocs ? > I suggest to put that readme.txt in wxCode\website CVS... ;-) =20 This one: /home/groups/w/wx/wxcode/readme.txt It's not really for public consumption, since it's just there to give some hints to the webmaster(s) on how things are done. Like I said, please add to it anything you figure out about the website that's not immediately obvious. I created it to help myself remember how it works. =20 > > Thirdly, for screenshots, we could create > > htdocs/screenshots/projectname and users put their screenshots there. > good idea; a special folder for the screenshots would make easier to put > a link to them in the complist but I'm unsure about removing them from > CVS... they could be very useful to people who just checkout the > wxCode\components to choose if use/not use that component. > But I understand that if all dev save their screenshots in CVS we'll end > up with a very heavy CVS repository... I don't think anyone has full screenshots in CVS? I mean, besides the projectname/website/image.png 160x120 ones which are quite small. I was refering to the "screenshots" link on wxcode.sourceforge.net http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/screens.html where people would probably want to put multiple full screenshots of their widget in action. (For example a 800x600 image can be over 100k, my 160x120 is about 10k IIRC.) > Just give me some time to: > 1) understand exactly how wxCode website works actually > 2) do my PHP experiments ;-) > so I'll be ready to discuss about these site changes better next week ;-) Cool. Thanks, John Labenski |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-25 07:06:20
|
Hi, >>I suggest to put that readme.txt in wxCode\website CVS... ;-) > This one: /home/groups/w/wx/wxcode/readme.txt > It's not really for public consumption, since it's just there to give > some hints to the webmaster(s) on how things are done. Like I said, > please add to it anything you figure out about the website that's not > immediately obvious. I created it to help myself remember how it > works. ok, I will put some notes in it once I get started; by now I'm doing some experiments offline with Apache 2.0 & PHP 5.0... >>>Thirdly, for screenshots, we could create >>>htdocs/screenshots/projectname and users put their screenshots there. >> >>good idea; a special folder for the screenshots would make easier to put >>a link to them in the complist but I'm unsure about removing them from >>CVS... they could be very useful to people who just checkout the >>wxCode\components to choose if use/not use that component. >>But I understand that if all dev save their screenshots in CVS we'll end >>up with a very heavy CVS repository... > > > I don't think anyone has full screenshots in CVS? ehm, *cough* http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/components/paletteframe/index.html *cough* ... > I mean, besides the > projectname/website/image.png 160x120 ones which are quite small. I > was refering to the "screenshots" link on wxcode.sourceforge.net > http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/screens.html > where people would probably want to put multiple full screenshots of > their widget in action. (For example a 800x600 image can be over 100k, > my 160x120 is about 10k IIRC.) Ok, that's a good idea. Francesco |
From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2005-06-25 19:15:33
|
On 6/25/05, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > > I don't think anyone has full screenshots in CVS? > ehm, *cough* > http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/components/paletteframe/index.html > *cough* Heh, I didn't mean to pick on you. Thats fine, once we get a way for people to do it thats where people can put new ones. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I also noticed that when you click on an item it tries to download this http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxcode/<projectname>.tar.gz?download Is there some reasonable way to get a generic (not numbers) address for the "show only this release" for a component, like this. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D51305&package_id=3D= 45182&release_id=3D257843 If not, I think it'd be best to remove that (or just make it point to the cvs web dir so they can check it out before downloading) and just point them to this at the top of the page. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D51305&package_id=3D= 45182 I hate having to download stuff that doesn't have any version info since you don't know what you got after a few months. Either that or you have to make up your own version for it. Regards, John Labenski |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-27 13:51:25
|
Hi, >>ehm, *cough* >>http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/components/paletteframe/index.html >> *cough* > > > Heh, I didn't mean to pick on you. Thats fine, once we get a way for > people to do it thats where people can put new ones. yes, sure ;-) > I also noticed that when you click on an item it tries to download this > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxcode/<projectname>.tar.gz?download > Is there some reasonable way to get a generic (not numbers) address > for the "show only this release" for a component, like this. > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=51305&package_id=45182&release_id=257843 unfortunately, reading SF.net docs that's not possible... > > If not, I think it'd be best to remove that (or just make it point to > the cvs web dir so they can check it out before downloading) and just > point them to this at the top of the page. > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=51305&package_id=45182 yes, I agree > I hate having to download stuff that doesn't have any version info > since you don't know what you got after a few months. Either that or > you have to make up your own version for it. That's true; without version info you cannot know if there is there was any change on the website... and I'd like to discuss this point: maybe some common rules for wxCode component 'versioning' could be created. I actually was reluctant to use a version number for each component since they are so small... still I now think we should all use something like that. Using three version numbers MAJOR.MINOR.RELEASE is the standard but usually it happens (at least to me) that such version string must be written in a lot of your project files (maybe 1 in the readme, 1 in the configure.in script, 1 in bakefile; they become already 3 files to edit for a new release !). Since components are small & a dev does not want to loose much time about it (usually), it should be able to make a new release quickly and thus possibly we should have only a version string to edit. Still, the user must be able to quickly find the version of the component he is actually using... Actually I do not use for my components version strings but release dates. If the user sees that there is a fresher download on the website he knows he's using something old. Still, this suffers from the same problem above; also dates are more annoying to use since it's easier to remember & handle version numbers. Maybe that we should put a "version.txt" file in each component and keep up to date only that. The PHP scripts of the website could scan these files and use them in the complist page to show to the user the last available version. All the problems above reflect the fact that I don't have much experience in handling such things; in my bigger projects I usually write buggy script which scan some files and replace version numbers using SED but it would be very annoying if I had to do it also for wxCode components ;-) Francesco Montorsi |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-27 15:26:28
|
Hi all, these are some things I thought for new wxCode website; feel free to give your opinion or let us know what you think is missing or what is superfluos... 1) create a new wxCode LOGO; something which gives the idea of an extension / additional components for wx; I know it's not easy to translate this effect in an image and also I'm very bad with graphics (looking at result, you won't believe it, my image.png files for my components took me a lot of time ;-)) 2) NEWS must be easy to add; SF.net tracker is easy to use but how to show it in our website ? I've found that it's possible to show SF.net news items in a website using SF HTML data export facility (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1502&group_id=1) so I suggest to begin to use SF news system which is much more easier & quicker to use rather than editing a page by hand, commit it to CVS, log in SF shell servers and checkout the website in the right folder ! 3) the STYLE of the website is a thing more subjective. I've found two XHTML-compliant styles which would be easy to use: http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1165&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc and http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1192&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc which one do you suggest ? Keep in mind that it should have a left sidebar menu; Sinorca theme (the first link provided above) is not frame-based but we could still modify it to use frames even if I think that's not required. 4) I suggest to use the following technologies for the website: XHTML 1.0 CSS 2.0 PHP 5.0 MySQL <--- this one would be useful for components info storing and since it's very easy to connect to PHP, it would allow to do a lot of things like show components categorized by author, category, name.... A good database for wxCode would have the following fields: -Name: (no restrictions: both lower and upper case) -Subdir: lowercase unix name / link to the site which hosts the component if it does not a CVS repository on wxCode -Status: Alpha/Beta/Stable/Unmantained (last one is for administrators which 'disappear': i.e. become unreachable and do not admin the component anymore) -Category: generic GUI / wxWindow-derived / non-GUI -wxWidgets supported version & port: wxMSW-2.6/wxGTK-2.5/.../all -Docs: doxygen/hand-written/not-available -Build system: bakefile-based/makefiles/project files/not-available -External dependencies: .... external libraries .../none -Admin contact info: my...@my... (i.e. an email address) -Wiki: enabled as comp's website/enabled/disabled (the first one could be used by those developers who do not want to use the CVS /website folder and want to have a wiki-way to edit the components' website) -Description: .... The submission form would create an email to wxCode-users and when administrator's approval is given, the submission form would add to the database the new component's info. 4) the htdocs ORGANIZATION: the website would be all in /htdocs (I omit /home/groups/w/wx/wxcode); the components website folders would go in /htdocs/components/compname folders; the components docs would go in /htdocs/docs/compname/ folders; the components screenshots would go in /htdocs/screenshots/compname folders; the WIKI would go in /htdocs/wiki and it would have a page (or more) for each component which can be used by users/developers/both for comments & info / component's website. 5) sections of the wxCode website which will appear on the left sidebar: - news (synched through PHP with SF.net ones) - about wxCode (what is it and a link to wxWidgets; some rules for the *users*: how to submit a buf/feature-request/patch tracker entry; how to subscribe wxcode-users... ) - components (the actual link to complist.php which links component websites, docs, screenshots, wikis, downloads) - submit your component (an overview of wxCode services; license issues; rules of component administration; submission form) - support (current support page) - links (current links page) - search (a google search link) 6) the wxCode component TEMPLATE: we should create a new folder in wxCode\template (or something like that) which provides: 1) a default dir structure for new components 2) link to the default bakefile build system 3) a simple website\index.html page which contains the sections: - description - screenshots - documentation - download details - further enhancements - known bugs - contact info which can also be used as wiki template page for those who want a wiki for their component's website. All wiki, components website & wxCode website should use the same style for a coherent design (see point #3). What do you think of this plan ? Thanks, Francesco Montorsi |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-27 18:19:23
|
> 2) NEWS must be easy to add; SF.net tracker is easy to use but how to > show it in our website ? > I've found that it's possible to show SF.net news items in a website > using SF HTML data export facility > (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1502&group_id=1) so > I suggest to begin to use SF news system which is much more easier & > quicker to use rather than editing a page by hand, commit it to CVS, log > in SF shell servers and checkout the website in the right folder ! > This is a nice idea but the newest news should be on the front page. Maybe you could add an include or else to show 3 news item on the front page and add a link to a full news page. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-27 22:16:10
|
Hi, Otto Wyss wrote: >>2) NEWS must be easy to add; SF.net tracker is easy to use but how to >>show it in our website ? >>I've found that it's possible to show SF.net news items in a website >>using SF HTML data export facility >>(http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1502&group_id=1) so >>I suggest to begin to use SF news system which is much more easier & >>quicker to use rather than editing a page by hand, commit it to CVS, log >>in SF shell servers and checkout the website in the right folder ! >> > > This is a nice idea but the newest news should be on the front page. > Maybe you could add an include or else to show 3 news item on the front > page and add a link to a full news page. I have in mind exactly that: with SF HTML data export you can include all tracker info in your webpages and thus you can embed SF news in the frontpage of your site... Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-27 18:26:13
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > 3) the STYLE of the website is a thing more subjective. I've found two > XHTML-compliant styles which would be easy to use: > http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1165&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc > > and > > http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1192&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc > I'm not happy with eider because the navigation still scolls away. There is a solution here "http://de.selfhtml.org/css/layouts/fixbereiche.htm" albeit in German. Maybe you are able to deduct it from the samples., the second last is the best. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-27 23:28:08
|
Hi, >>3) the STYLE of the website is a thing more subjective. I've found two >>XHTML-compliant styles which would be easy to use: >>http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1165&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc >> >>and >> >>http://www.oswd.org/viewdesign.phtml?id=1192&referer=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fpage%3D1%26sort%3Ddownloadsdesc >> > > I'm not happy with eider because the navigation still scolls away. There > is a solution here "http://de.selfhtml.org/css/layouts/fixbereiche.htm" > albeit in German. Maybe you are able to deduct it from the samples., the > second last is the best. it took me some time but I finally managed to modify the Sinorca theme to work in fixed mode navigation... I attach to this mail a little zip containing the modified sinorca index page. The problem is that in broken IE the sidebar menu still results non-fixed and scrolls together with the page... but on my great Firefox it works perfectly... I think this is an acceptable behaviour. Let me know, Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-28 20:36:14
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > > I'm not happy with eider because the navigation still scolls away. There > > is a solution here "http://de.selfhtml.org/css/layouts/fixbereiche.htm" > > albeit in German. Maybe you are able to deduct it from the samples., the > > second last is the best. > it took me some time but I finally managed to modify the Sinorca theme > to work in fixed mode navigation... I attach to this mail a little zip > containing the modified sinorca index page. > The problem is that in broken IE the sidebar menu still results > non-fixed and scrolls together with the page... but on my great Firefox > it works perfectly... I think this is an acceptable behaviour. > Your zip didn't got through the mailing list. Best if you can just move the page to the folder "htdocs/test" of wxCode. Firefox is good and the behaviour for IE is acceptable. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-28 22:39:50
|
Hi, > Your zip didn't got through the mailing list. Best if you can just move > the page to the folder "htdocs/test" of wxCode. done; you can access it using the link: http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/test/ > Firefox is good and the behaviour for IE is acceptable. I managed to fix the page also for IE ! It's now fully compliant ;-) Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-29 16:00:22
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > http://wxcode.sourceforge.net/test/ > > > Firefox is good and the behaviour for IE is acceptable. > I managed to fix the page also for IE ! > It's now fully compliant ;-) > Perfect. 2 small points, the Goole search field is too wide for the column in a 800x600 display and I would draw a small border around the scrollable window. Just fill in once the texts of the current front page. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-29 16:26:01
|
Hi, > Perfect. ;-) > 2 small points, the Goole search field is too wide for the > column in a 800x600 display I replaced the size attribute from that INPUT tag with WIDTH=90% but I cannot test it on my PC (which uses 1024x768)... > and I would draw a small border around the > scrollable window. Just fill in once the texts of the current front page. added; still I like the page without it since the highlighted button has a white background colour which matches the page suggesting to the user a 'connection' between the button and the content... however this is a minor point... by now, I'm working on PHP scripts + mySQL locally; I hope the slightly different versions used by SF won't give me much troubles when switching... Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-29 17:48:36
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > > and I would draw a small border around the > > scrollable window. Just fill in once the texts of the current front page. > added; still I like the page without it since the highlighted button has > a white background colour which matches the page suggesting to the user > a 'connection' between the button and the content... however this is a > minor point... > Just think I always browse the net with my own background (white) ;-) O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-28 23:04:12
|
Hi, need to correct/comment myself ;-) > 1) create a new wxCode LOGO; something which gives the idea of an > extension / additional components for wx; I know it's not easy to > translate this effect in an image and also I'm very bad with graphics > (looking at result, you won't believe it, my image.png files for my > components took me a lot of time ;-)) I've now access to 3d studio max 5 which can be used (improperly) to generate 3d logos... however I wonder if Jorgen Bodde could help us with graphics; I remember he said on wx mailing list he was good in these things... > 4) I suggest to use the following technologies for the website: > XHTML 1.0 > CSS 2.0 > PHP 5.0 I checked and I've found that SF still uses 4.3 so we must adapt... Also, if we want to use a database in the website (I strongly suggest this), we need to opt-in for database usage in SF administration page -> Shell/DB/Web page (which I cannot access...) Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-29 16:04:26
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > I've now access to 3d studio max 5 which can be used (improperly) to > generate 3d logos... however I wonder if Jorgen Bodde could help us with > graphics; I remember he said on wx mailing list he was good in these > things... > I'd love if someone updates the graphics on wyoGuide/wyoDesktop ;-) > > 4) I suggest to use the following technologies for the website: > > XHTML 1.0 > > CSS 2.0 > > PHP 5.0 > I checked and I've found that SF still uses 4.3 so we must adapt... > Also, if we want to use a database in the website (I strongly suggest > this), we need to opt-in for database usage in SF administration page -> > Shell/DB/Web page (which I cannot access...) > What access do you need? O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-29 16:15:50
|
Hi, >>I've now access to 3d studio max 5 which can be used (improperly) to >>generate 3d logos... however I wonder if Jorgen Bodde could help us with >>graphics; I remember he said on wx mailing list he was good in these >>things... >> > > I'd love if someone updates the graphics on wyoGuide/wyoDesktop ;-) I'll ask him... :-) >>I checked and I've found that SF still uses 4.3 so we must adapt... >>Also, if we want to use a database in the website (I strongly suggest >>this), we need to opt-in for database usage in SF administration page -> >>Shell/DB/Web page (which I cannot access...) > > What access do you need? Only people with full administrative rights can open the https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/database.php?group_id=51305 page... i.e. only you or John... Francesco |
From: Otto W. <ott...@or...> - 2005-06-29 17:51:48
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > > > What access do you need? > Only people with full administrative rights can open the > > https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/database.php?group_id=51305 > > page... i.e. only you or John... > No problem, you are now a project manager as well. O. Wyss -- Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net How to build well-designed applications: http://wyoguide.sf.net Desktop with a consistent look and feel: http://wyodesktop.sf.net |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-29 20:12:48
|
Hi, > No problem, you are now a project manager as well. Thanks. However I see that a wxCode database already exists; it also already have some data in it (2 tables, components & newadds...)... were you already using it ? Francesco |
From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2005-06-30 19:00:31
|
Hi, > However I see that a wxCode database already exists; it also already > have some data in it (2 tables, components & newadds...)... were you > already using it ? besides this database issue (also I'd like to inform you that I've changed the password to 'test' to be able to access it...) I want to ask a thing: since Sinorca webtheme requires quite a lot of code repetition (like any other theme which is XHTML compliant) I've found successful two different types of solutions: 1) use PHP include() statement in all files to include the repeated stuff. Advantages: easy ! Disavantages: requires work from the server on each page request... 2) use an XSLT file which takes the text from rough XML files and then produces the well-formatted XHTML files; this could be set up to be done in real-time on each page request (but this would be useless since we are already using PHP technology for other things and this would be like solution #1 just using a different - perhaps slower - approach!) or to be done offline using an XSLT processor. This requires to have - iconv.dll - libxml2.dll - libxslt.dll - zlib1.dll - libexslt.dll - xsltproc.exe installed on the PC in order to have XSLTPROC working.... the advantage of doing the XHTML generation offline is that the server then needs only to send the page to the user and thus is faster. However since we will be using PHP for other things (like mySQL access) the pages still would require webserver processing and thus I suggest to use approach #1. Francesco |