From: Tone G. <ton...@wh...> - 2014-11-04 13:00:45
|
Thank you. On 11/04/2014 06:30 AM, Ulrich Telle wrote: > Am 04.11.2014 02:06, schrieb Tone Garot: >>> Then again, you're using SQLite, which is already a step down from >>> more powerful DB engines. SQLite is good for extremely simple >>> relational DBs, but if you think you need a full ORM to wrap a much >>> less simple DB, there's a decent chance you shouldn't be using SQLite >>> at all. >> Could you recommend a better server-less, cross-platform database >> engine, please? > IMHO, SQLite3 is definitely a good choice for a server-less database. > Its SQL engine is fully fledged and implements most features of the > SQL92 standard. Personally, I use it for an application which requires > referential integrity and triggers with databases of up to 0.5 GB of data. > > For missing SQL92 features, see > http://www.sqlite.org/omitted.html > > For pointers when to use or not use SQLite, see > http://sqlite.org/whentouse.html > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wxCode-users mailing list > wxC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users -- *Tone Garot* Architect, Lead Programmer Whimbrel, LLC /Digital Asset Management Tools/ |