From: Ulrich T. <Ulr...@gm...> - 2005-09-04 21:25:04
|
> > 'window container', 'dialog', 'control', 'window layout', > > 'networking', 'stream', 'database', > > 'data container', > > 'graphics' > > 'text processing' > > 'printing' > > 'import/export' > > 'system', > > 'tutorials/documentation' , > > 'application' > > 'miscellaneous', > > 'wrapper' Please try to eliminate ''miscellaneous'. I find it better to introduce new categories than to allow such an unspecific category. In my opinion 'system' is a too general term. I would propose something like 'operating system oriented' (or shorter 'os oriented'). > > I think graphics could cover wxImage stuff and wxDC anything to do > > with drawing and images, wxPlot could go here then. wxPDFDocument > > could be import/export and graphics. > after looking at the component list, I see that it's not so > generic.... so it's okay for me. For wxPdfDocument I would use the categories 'printing' and 'graphics'. I wouldn't expect it to be found in 'import/export' > >>text what would group ? > > > > Text processing, wxScintilla, wxSpellcheck... > ok, "text processing" is a better name ;) I agree. > > I think just calling it "system" would allow it to cover wxCTB (serial > > port) as well as filesystem stuff, there will probably only be a > > couple of these. > the best option would probably to create something like "hardware" for wxCTB but I think > wxCTB would be the only component inside it :-) > So "system" is okay, after all. See my comment above. Regards, Ulrich -- E-Mail privat: Ulr...@gm... E-Mail Studium: Ulr...@Fe... World Wide Web: http://www.stud.fernuni-hagen.de/q1471341 |