Re: [wxCode-users] wxCode categories (please ALL read)

[Francesco M. <f18...@ya...>]

> 'window container', 'dialog', 'control', 'window layout',
> 'networking', 'stream', 'database',
> 'data container',
> 'graphics'
> 'text processing'
> 'printing'
> 'import/export'
> 'system',
> 'tutorials/documentation' ,
> 'application'
> 'miscellaneous',
> 'wrapper'
> 



>>>I added
>>>graphics, text, and system (hardware and platform dep stuff here),
>>
>>I think it's a good idea group together platform-dependent stuff but I don't know if
>>"graphics, text, and system" are good names; they sounds too generic for me...
>>
>>wx docs have a "device contexts" category; maybe this is better than "graphics" (even if
>>to be honest "device contexts" sounds a little bit too specific for me ;-))
> 
> 
> I think graphics could cover wxImage stuff and wxDC anything to do
> with drawing and images, wxPlot could go here then. wxPDFDocument
> could be import/export and graphics.
after looking at the component list, I see that it's not so generic.... so it's okay for me.


>>text what would group ?
> 
> Text processing, wxScintilla, wxSpellcheck...
ok, "text processing" is a better name ;)



>>system instead would be useful, for example for UnixfileDataClass; however to make it
>>clear it's platform dependent stuff I would call it "system-dependent"...
> 
> 
> I think just calling it "system" would allow it to cover wxCTB (serial
> port) as well as filesystem stuff, there will probably only be a
> couple of these.
the best option would probably to create something like "hardware" for wxCTB but I think 
wxCTB would be the only component inside it :-)
So "system" is okay, after all.

Francesco